<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Sandy Bridge facing limited availability</title>
		<description>Discuss Sandy Bridge facing limited availability</description>
		<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21426-sandy-bridge-facing-limited-availability</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 07:10:08 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.fudzilla.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_k2/21426/10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>nECrO says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21426-sandy-bridge-facing-limited-availability#comment-13510</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Well said. You saved me some typing. What all of this really boils down to is that if the chip companies can keep the geeks (all of us) fighting and buzzing about their products, they sell more stuff and the guy at the computer store will keep telling Joe Sixpack he REALLY needs an i7 rig to read e-mail and surf the internets...]]></description>
			<dc:creator>nECrO</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2011 18:30:53 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21426-sandy-bridge-facing-limited-availability#comment-13510</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Bl0bb3r says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21426-sandy-bridge-facing-limited-availability#comment-13455</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Because the sticker says it's better?... I'm talking about the 99% of people. And not to upset you too much, if Via's Nano is so much better than Atom, why did people rush to buy that crap intel was putting out? The sticker says it all. Actually, most people don't care about the technicality, they just ask someone who's supposed to help or could help in this matter and the golden question is: is it good?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Bl0bb3r</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2011 08:51:07 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21426-sandy-bridge-facing-limited-availability#comment-13455</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Naterm says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21426-sandy-bridge-facing-limited-availability#comment-13452</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Oh, and you contradicted yourself. If 99% of consumers don't care about performance, then why will they rush to adopt better performing Brazos netbooks? Because they're disappointed with the performance? I bet your crackpipe is hot to the touch.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Naterm</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2011 08:21:17 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21426-sandy-bridge-facing-limited-availability#comment-13452</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Naterm says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21426-sandy-bridge-facing-limited-availability#comment-13451</link>
			<description><![CDATA[No, I doubt that. It has to do with the fact that they're a kludge. They're somewhere between a tablet and a laptop. You don't get the portability and lean operating system you get with a tablet and you don't get the performance of a laptop. Hate to burst your bubble, but any tablet running a Brazos-type processor is going to be a dud. No battery life. Tablets will be packing ARM for the near-term. They'll all be running Android, iOS, QNX, or maybe webOS. They won't be needing a Brazos to push Windows' fatass up the hill for a year at least.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Naterm</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2011 08:19:06 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21426-sandy-bridge-facing-limited-availability#comment-13451</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Naterm says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21426-sandy-bridge-facing-limited-availability#comment-13450</link>
			<description><![CDATA[It's laughable if you don't know what you're talking about or you have fanboy delusions. Intel's pricing on their low-end chips is artificially high. Most of these price points were announced just prior to or shortly after anti-trust proceedings. Most intelligent people, not you apparently, concluded that intel was playing it safe with regards to regulators and weren't fully putting the hurt on AMD.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Naterm</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2011 08:15:30 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21426-sandy-bridge-facing-limited-availability#comment-13450</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>nECrO says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21426-sandy-bridge-facing-limited-availability#comment-13448</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Naive, misleading and just plain wrong. As long as Intel doesn't sell chips for a loss and reward OEM's for not using AMD, they can drop prices all they want. They don't because they have no reason to. They are profitable as they are now. Saying that they are "giving AMD a break" is so naive it's laughable. Business 101, (not taught at Fanboy High School) Sell your product for the highest price you can get or the market will bear. Drop prices only when the competition threatens to take marketshare/sales.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>nECrO</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2011 07:24:40 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21426-sandy-bridge-facing-limited-availability#comment-13448</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>nECrO says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21426-sandy-bridge-facing-limited-availability#comment-13447</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I would guess that netbook sales slowing has more to do with weak, pathetic performance than consumer indifference. If so, Fusion will help that. Brazos doesn't need to be out, Ontario is and will be eating Atom's lunch soon. This doesn't even take tablets/slates into account. Late? a bit. Too late? not even close.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>nECrO</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2011 07:08:07 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21426-sandy-bridge-facing-limited-availability#comment-13447</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>nECrO says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21426-sandy-bridge-facing-limited-availability#comment-13446</link>
			<description><![CDATA[No. 99% of the buying public is made up of average users who don't know a CPU from a wombat. Their CPU's sit idle 99.99999999999% of their entire lives. To these people a Pentium 4, a Sempron and an I7 seem the same as long as the machine is virus/malware free and operating at it's peak. Only fanboy's geeks, enthusiasts, gamers and power users, who make up 1% of the buying public, care about per-core performance. And I would venture to guess a good many of them aren't taxing their machines either. This goes for Intel or AMD. Keep up the hype. It fuels spending and helps the economy....]]></description>
			<dc:creator>nECrO</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2011 07:03:30 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21426-sandy-bridge-facing-limited-availability#comment-13446</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Naterm says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21426-sandy-bridge-facing-limited-availability#comment-13433</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Simply wrong? For one thing, Brazos isn't out yet. So that one is crap right off the bat. Second, netbooks are trending down. AMD is way too late to get significant profits from that segment. Rules is a huge stretch. They don't rule based on performance, they rule based on intel not wanting to anger regulatory bodies that are already after them. Intel could cut the prices of their low-end processors to gut AMD if they felt they could get way with it without significant regulatory heat. They're giving AMD a break, AMD isn't winning anything. Think about the big picture next time. AMD is not competitive in any SIGNIFICANT fashion.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Naterm</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2011 04:29:35 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21426-sandy-bridge-facing-limited-availability#comment-13433</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>East17 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21426-sandy-bridge-facing-limited-availability#comment-13427</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Simply wrong. 1)In the NetBook market Intel's Atom is simply crap and will drop dead in front of Brazos .. I'm not even talking aout Llano. 2)AMD rules in the "under 200$" CPU market. There is NO Intel CPU under 200$ that would bring better value then AMD's solutions . And that's where 80% of the CPU market is .. under 200$.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>East17</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2011 04:17:54 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21426-sandy-bridge-facing-limited-availability#comment-13427</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
