<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Intel plans 70 + percent of Q3 2011 to be 32nm</title>
		<description>Discuss Intel plans 70 + percent of Q3 2011 to be 32nm</description>
		<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21344-intel-plans-70-%20-percent-of-q3-2011-to-be-32nm</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 03:57:29 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.fudzilla.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_k2/21344/10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>DJDestiny says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21344-intel-plans-70-%20-percent-of-q3-2011-to-be-32nm#comment-12881</link>
			<description><![CDATA[AMD Switches over to a whole new architecture , without leaving any products with older fab processes .]]></description>
			<dc:creator>DJDestiny</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2010 15:28:27 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21344-intel-plans-70-%20-percent-of-q3-2011-to-be-32nm#comment-12881</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>The_Countess says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21344-intel-plans-70-%20-percent-of-q3-2011-to-be-32nm#comment-12819</link>
			<description><![CDATA[mostly because they can, because they have always worked with just 1 fab. its financially cheaper to switch that over completely quickly. my main point is that even with intel on 22nm, it will be well over a year before they fazes out 32nm.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>The_Countess</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 26 Dec 2010 01:09:17 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21344-intel-plans-70-%20-percent-of-q3-2011-to-be-32nm#comment-12819</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>AndromedaB says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21344-intel-plans-70-%20-percent-of-q3-2011-to-be-32nm#comment-12812</link>
			<description><![CDATA[because it needs two. IIRC they are still on 40 are they not?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>AndromedaB</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 25 Dec 2010 15:26:44 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21344-intel-plans-70-%20-percent-of-q3-2011-to-be-32nm#comment-12812</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>The_Countess says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21344-intel-plans-70-%20-percent-of-q3-2011-to-be-32nm#comment-12810</link>
			<description><![CDATA[AMD of course doesn't need a year after first the release of a new process to reach just 70%. with or without fabs.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>The_Countess</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 25 Dec 2010 14:09:35 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21344-intel-plans-70-%20-percent-of-q3-2011-to-be-32nm#comment-12810</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Jurassic1024 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21344-intel-plans-70-%20-percent-of-q3-2011-to-be-32nm#comment-12800</link>
			<description><![CDATA[That would make AMD a little girl with a polka dot dress and a lollipop.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Jurassic1024</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 25 Dec 2010 11:58:26 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21344-intel-plans-70-%20-percent-of-q3-2011-to-be-32nm#comment-12800</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Marburg_U says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21344-intel-plans-70-%20-percent-of-q3-2011-to-be-32nm#comment-12790</link>
			<description><![CDATA["Real men have fabs"]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Marburg_U</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 25 Dec 2010 00:19:30 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21344-intel-plans-70-%20-percent-of-q3-2011-to-be-32nm#comment-12790</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
