<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Zambezi Bulldozer comes by April 2011</title>
		<description>Discuss Zambezi Bulldozer comes by April 2011</description>
		<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21332-zambezi-bulldozer-comes-by-april-2011</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 20:12:00 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.fudzilla.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_k2/21332/10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>techno says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21332-zambezi-bulldozer-comes-by-april-2011#comment-12992</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I'm thinking of jumping ship from my Q6600 to bulldozer when it comes out but I'm a little concerned about the longevity of the AM3+ socket, considering the first bulldozers are not going to be fussion products just wondering if later fussion bulldozer iterations which I'm sure will come soon will use a different socket?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>techno</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 28 Dec 2010 21:57:32 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21332-zambezi-bulldozer-comes-by-april-2011#comment-12992</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Dave_Tangeir says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21332-zambezi-bulldozer-comes-by-april-2011#comment-12857</link>
			<description><![CDATA[You clearly do not know what you are talking about.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Dave_Tangeir</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2010 07:47:24 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21332-zambezi-bulldozer-comes-by-april-2011#comment-12857</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Naterm says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21332-zambezi-bulldozer-comes-by-april-2011#comment-12855</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Again, you don't have a clue. intel isn't using x86 for the graphics on Sandy Bridge so comparing them to "P3s" is ridiculous. Also, anyone who makes deriding marks about clock speed also shows their ignorance. The fact is that despite all AMD's talk about Fusion, intel was first with graphics integrated on and later integrated into the processor. intel has also made large performance gains from Westmere to Sandy Bridge in the GPU performance area. If the trend continues it won't be long before they're performance competitive with AMD's still-unreleased on processor graphics.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Naterm</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2010 06:49:54 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21332-zambezi-bulldozer-comes-by-april-2011#comment-12855</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Naterm says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21332-zambezi-bulldozer-comes-by-april-2011#comment-12854</link>
			<description><![CDATA[So two integer units equals the performance of two full cores at lower power consumption? Good god you AMD fanboys can drink Kool Aid. 'It thinks differently'? WTF? AMD going to two integer cores is a result of their current architecture choking on highly threaded workloads. It's like a more complicated, more power hungry, but also probably better performing version of SMT. SMT doesn't make one core perform like two, neither will adding another integer core.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Naterm</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2010 06:34:57 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21332-zambezi-bulldozer-comes-by-april-2011#comment-12854</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>DJDestiny says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21332-zambezi-bulldozer-comes-by-april-2011#comment-12841</link>
			<description><![CDATA[When you have 4 modules instead of 8 cores , it thinks differently , stuff performs on 1 module like 1 core , but with the power of 2 core , that saves energy . Unlike somebody's on die gpu , which has 6 or 12 P3's running on P3 speeds .]]></description>
			<dc:creator>DJDestiny</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 26 Dec 2010 20:49:47 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21332-zambezi-bulldozer-comes-by-april-2011#comment-12841</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>youserzero says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21332-zambezi-bulldozer-comes-by-april-2011#comment-12798</link>
			<description><![CDATA[The sb850 didn't have a native ethernet.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>youserzero</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 25 Dec 2010 10:47:54 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21332-zambezi-bulldozer-comes-by-april-2011#comment-12798</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Naterm says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21332-zambezi-bulldozer-comes-by-april-2011#comment-12757</link>
			<description><![CDATA[So AMD's "8-core" products are supposed to compete with intel's quad core products? Not to mention that this thing really isn't eight cores, you really can't even think of this architecture in terms of cores. It's a four module version. It is fairly exciting to think that AMD may actually be a legitimate alternative for the first time in a long time.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Naterm</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 24 Dec 2010 18:00:30 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21332-zambezi-bulldozer-comes-by-april-2011#comment-12757</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>terrace215 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21332-zambezi-bulldozer-comes-by-april-2011#comment-12722</link>
			<description><![CDATA[IP = "initial production", not launch]]></description>
			<dc:creator>terrace215</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 24 Dec 2010 10:14:34 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21332-zambezi-bulldozer-comes-by-april-2011#comment-12722</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Bl0bb3r says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21332-zambezi-bulldozer-comes-by-april-2011#comment-12721</link>
			<description><![CDATA[The slides list it as a DX 10.1 part, so that make it still 800 series. Probably it will have a SB from the 900 series since these are the ones that add CPU compatibility. I guess is has to do with AMD dropping support for IGP chipsets... who knows, anyway AM3+ is a crowd pleaser so that they don't get upset for not having a clean upgrade path... or somewhat clean. I'd still wait and skip a series or so to get some of the bugs fixed before shelling out cash if value is important.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Bl0bb3r</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 24 Dec 2010 09:59:21 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21332-zambezi-bulldozer-comes-by-april-2011#comment-12721</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Regenweald says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21332-zambezi-bulldozer-comes-by-april-2011#comment-12716</link>
			<description><![CDATA[8 cores, brand new performance architecture. Now the question: What Price? If these beat Hyperthreaded 2600K's, then we're in for exciting times :lol:]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Regenweald</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 24 Dec 2010 05:13:02 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21332-zambezi-bulldozer-comes-by-april-2011#comment-12716</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
