<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Intel netbook plans shattered by tablets</title>
		<description>Discuss Intel netbook plans shattered by tablets</description>
		<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21239-intel-netbook-plans-shattered-by-tablets</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 01:01:21 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.fudzilla.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_k2/21239/10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>Naterm says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21239-intel-netbook-plans-shattered-by-tablets#comment-12281</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Again with this? An Atom has double the clock speed, sometimes double the execution cores, double the cache, many times the bus speed, and generally access to much more memory and is draw much, much less power. In performance per watt metrics it's not even close between the old mobile PIII processors and the Atom even though it's using IOE instead of OOE. It's much more accurate to compare the Atom to early Banias/Dothan designs than it is the PIII. But of course, you don't really know anything anyway.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Naterm</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2010 11:15:30 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21239-intel-netbook-plans-shattered-by-tablets#comment-12281</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Naterm says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21239-intel-netbook-plans-shattered-by-tablets#comment-12280</link>
			<description><![CDATA[What, did your crystal ball say that? You actually have no idea, none. Intel has a massive amount of inertia in this market, they'll no doubt improve their designs, and likely AMD won't gain significantly higher marketshare in this market than it owns in any other PC market (~10%). Not to mention that the netbook market was a sort of stop gap between notebooks and effective tablet computers. It'll not last. AMD would be much better served by pushing Bobcat towoards hyperscale servers where they can sell for higher margins.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Naterm</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2010 11:11:20 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21239-intel-netbook-plans-shattered-by-tablets#comment-12280</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Bl0bb3r says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21239-intel-netbook-plans-shattered-by-tablets#comment-12233</link>
			<description><![CDATA[He wanted to say Atom setups are more expensive... the chip itself is not but the chipset is and the license to make Atom boards is as well. Also there is a premium, some of that usually goes to the sales persons as an incentive to sell Intel.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Bl0bb3r</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2010 20:44:31 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21239-intel-netbook-plans-shattered-by-tablets#comment-12233</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>romon says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21239-intel-netbook-plans-shattered-by-tablets#comment-12231</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Thats actually not true. Atom Oak Trial chip with Meego is only $25. AMD's higher performing zacate (relative to Atom) is priced at $500 netbook/ low end notebook. http://www.anandtech.com/show/3933/amds-zacate-apu-performance-update AMD's Ontario is Intel Atom's competitor.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>romon</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2010 20:13:32 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21239-intel-netbook-plans-shattered-by-tablets#comment-12231</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>DJDestiny says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21239-intel-netbook-plans-shattered-by-tablets#comment-12221</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Intel , their atom chips were 300% more expensive and 300% slower . ( Or rather PIII Katmai Era based chips )]]></description>
			<dc:creator>DJDestiny</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2010 17:38:54 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21239-intel-netbook-plans-shattered-by-tablets#comment-12221</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>yourma2000 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21239-intel-netbook-plans-shattered-by-tablets#comment-12198</link>
			<description><![CDATA[AMD have already secured the netbook department with Fusion for 2011 onwards, no doubt that will be affecting Atom sales in netbooks]]></description>
			<dc:creator>yourma2000</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2010 13:48:41 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21239-intel-netbook-plans-shattered-by-tablets#comment-12198</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
