<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Otellini touts 35 tablet design wins</title>
		<description>Discuss Otellini touts 35 tablet design wins</description>
		<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21149-otellini-touts-35-tablet-design-wins</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 15:38:08 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.fudzilla.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_k2/21149/10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>hoohoo says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21149-otellini-touts-35-tablet-design-wins#comment-11352</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Atom is hard to take seriously in the face of Bobcat and (haha) Sandy Bridge and ARM's newest designs. Atom was a desperation move on Intel's part to prevent a full-on tech excursion break-out by ARM in the netbook market. Atom will not cost Intel as much as Itanic has, but Atom will be is just as pointless in the final analysis as Itanic has been.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>hoohoo</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 09 Dec 2010 22:59:17 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21149-otellini-touts-35-tablet-design-wins#comment-11352</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
