<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Radeon HD 6970 is 10 - 20% faster than GTX 480</title>
		<description>Discuss Radeon HD 6970 is 10 - 20% faster than GTX 480</description>
		<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21128-radeon-hd-6970-is-10-20-faster-than-gtx-480</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 14:38:39 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.fudzilla.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_k2/21128/10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>mack-attack says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21128-radeon-hd-6970-is-10-20-faster-than-gtx-480#comment-11515</link>
			<description><![CDATA[so when was this update added? does that make the more current amd news on the front page irrelivent?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>mack-attack</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 10 Dec 2010 23:27:47 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21128-radeon-hd-6970-is-10-20-faster-than-gtx-480#comment-11515</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Nemtrac says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21128-radeon-hd-6970-is-10-20-faster-than-gtx-480#comment-11395</link>
			<description><![CDATA[it's strange that this article is on the second page already?! What's the sorting algorithem? More hits, more comment's the lover the rating on the site? And why are the other Cayman articles stil on the first page? Or is it joust a realy bad article that needs to disapear? I dont expect an answer but its strange to hide a article whitch makes so mutch cash with hits. :o]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Nemtrac</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 10 Dec 2010 12:50:41 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21128-radeon-hd-6970-is-10-20-faster-than-gtx-480#comment-11395</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Stormkroe says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21128-radeon-hd-6970-is-10-20-faster-than-gtx-480#comment-11376</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Does anyone else find it strange that something like performance per watt is so important, now that the ATI camp is winning in that area? I find it amusing that people are making such a huge deal about numbers that are negligible in almost every way. It seems like the people chanting 'Fermi a year late' are forgetting that there's 15 months between 5870 and 6970. It gives me great joy to point out how biased and stupid both sides are being. :)]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Stormkroe</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 10 Dec 2010 04:37:16 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21128-radeon-hd-6970-is-10-20-faster-than-gtx-480#comment-11376</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>fuadzilla says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21128-radeon-hd-6970-is-10-20-faster-than-gtx-480#comment-11286</link>
			<description><![CDATA[factor in price, power consumption and temperature, you'll see nv being blown out of the sky... and also, fuad, you should get a new hobby, mate. seriously!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>fuadzilla</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 09 Dec 2010 14:42:45 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21128-radeon-hd-6970-is-10-20-faster-than-gtx-480#comment-11286</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>jedm33 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21128-radeon-hd-6970-is-10-20-faster-than-gtx-480#comment-11276</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Wow another cayman update brought to us by the great nvidia fanboy... give us some real, credible, and unbiased facts about AMD fuad...]]></description>
			<dc:creator>jedm33</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 09 Dec 2010 13:32:08 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21128-radeon-hd-6970-is-10-20-faster-than-gtx-480#comment-11276</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Boomstick777 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21128-radeon-hd-6970-is-10-20-faster-than-gtx-480#comment-11272</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Just read the update to this post, lol could fudzilla be the least professional website? I only log in here to see the moronic posts and comments lol. I am a fan of AMD and Nvidia, Nvidia seem to be getting back on track with Fermi now the GTX 570 looks awesome, AMD's cards will be very good aswell. If performance on the new top ends cards is within 10% of each other then either card will be a beast, this round it looks like both AMD and Nvidia have competitive cards..]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Boomstick777</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 09 Dec 2010 12:45:30 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21128-radeon-hd-6970-is-10-20-faster-than-gtx-480#comment-11272</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>kapeeteeleest_peeg says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21128-radeon-hd-6970-is-10-20-faster-than-gtx-480#comment-11268</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Ati should have stacked 5xxx series high & sold 'em with the thinnest of margins... and cut nVidia's throat while it was still trying to work out how to get a pubic hairs width, more performance out of double ati's die area size! lol Can't wait for Cayman so that gtx 5xx will be sold at a loss per card, jus like gtx 4xx! Does anyone @ nVidia know what efficiency means?, ...anyone? ...no? The Update is that Ati is saying nothing because its going to be a 'Game Changer'! 580 wont have a look in!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>kapeeteeleest_peeg</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 09 Dec 2010 11:22:12 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21128-radeon-hd-6970-is-10-20-faster-than-gtx-480#comment-11268</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>techno says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21128-radeon-hd-6970-is-10-20-faster-than-gtx-480#comment-11267</link>
			<description><![CDATA[lol......make sure you read the update to this article.....Fuad has served up incorrect info....and now admits 6970 is going to be quite a bit faster......so quite a bit faster than the "20% faster" than 480 should take the crown from 580 (even if 580 is flagship vapourware)]]></description>
			<dc:creator>techno</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 09 Dec 2010 10:51:19 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21128-radeon-hd-6970-is-10-20-faster-than-gtx-480#comment-11267</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Nemtrac says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21128-radeon-hd-6970-is-10-20-faster-than-gtx-480#comment-11263</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Could the lower price of the 6970 come from good yailds and the lower die size? Then AMD would hawe the same mergins as NV with a lower price couse the cost's are down?! To Quote Charlie: http://www.semiaccurate.com/2010/12/03/ati-cuts-6950-allocation/]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Nemtrac</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 09 Dec 2010 08:47:52 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21128-radeon-hd-6970-is-10-20-faster-than-gtx-480#comment-11263</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>arclight says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21128-radeon-hd-6970-is-10-20-faster-than-gtx-480#comment-11261</link>
			<description><![CDATA[My take on GTX 570 is that overall it only performs 1% better than GTX 480. My proff: http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/ASUS/GeForce_GTX_570/27.html That's only impressive when you think that the card achieves this performance with lesser specs than GTX480 (less bus bandwidth, less memory, less power consuption). If overall HD 6970 is faster with 10% compared to GTX 480 than to me it seems it will be a clear winner when compared to GTX570 in terms of performance. The question is if the performance of the 6970 will justify the higher price, and if the community won't like the price AMD will lower it, fact which isn't such a bad thing.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>arclight</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 09 Dec 2010 08:14:27 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21128-radeon-hd-6970-is-10-20-faster-than-gtx-480#comment-11261</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
