<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title> AMD ships two new speedy Phenoms</title>
		<description>Discuss  AMD ships two new speedy Phenoms</description>
		<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21111-amd-ships-two-new-speedy-phenoms</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 04:43:49 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.fudzilla.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_k2/21111/10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>loadwick says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21111-amd-ships-two-new-speedy-phenoms#comment-11234</link>
			<description><![CDATA[How long a socket lastest is such a big deal as everyone seems to be making out. At a guess i would say that +95% of CPU sales is for entire new systems. I know when i am buying myself it has to last a few years. So I would probably have to buy a new mobo whether Intel kept their pin count for 1 year or 3. Manufactures are held back making mobo's compatible with outdated CPUs, Intel just tries to drive innovation by changing things up frequently, and ok they make money too but who buy a few CPUs a year?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>loadwick</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 09 Dec 2010 02:02:30 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21111-amd-ships-two-new-speedy-phenoms#comment-11234</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>loadwick says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21111-amd-ships-two-new-speedy-phenoms#comment-11230</link>
			<description><![CDATA[My second point is, AMD what the hell are doing? Why waste your money (packaging) on a pathetic upgrade like this? We are talking about a core speed increase from 3.2GHz to 3.3GHz, or 3%!! Who's mind will have been change about spending their money on an x6 because its now at 3.3GHz but wasn't willing to buy it at 3.2GHz?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>loadwick</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 09 Dec 2010 01:46:35 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21111-amd-ships-two-new-speedy-phenoms#comment-11230</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>loadwick says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21111-amd-ships-two-new-speedy-phenoms#comment-11227</link>
			<description><![CDATA[For me, people seem to be missing the point of benchmarks. When putting together a new computer you either buy a system as cheaply as possible that can still do what you need it to do or you buy decent, more expensive, future proofing system. If you do the former then you shouldn't be looking at the expensive Black Edition chips, if you are doing the later then while fps above 60 are a waste 'in that game' its an indication of how well they will cope with future, more demanding games.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>loadwick</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 09 Dec 2010 01:39:44 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21111-amd-ships-two-new-speedy-phenoms#comment-11227</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>arclight says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21111-amd-ships-two-new-speedy-phenoms#comment-11192</link>
			<description><![CDATA[What's alarming for me is the fact that slower clocked quad cores like 925, 945 are impossible to find on stock at any major e-tailer in my country. For me those quad cores have the best value and i'm not happy about the fact i have to buy a 955, since that's the cheapest one on stock. Can fudzilla do a scan on availability of slower Phenom II quads? This might be a world wide thing, AMD could discontinue slower CPUs. Matter of fact i haven't seen Phenom II x3 720 or Phenom II x4 840 in stock for a year now at any major store in my country.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>arclight</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2010 18:52:18 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21111-amd-ships-two-new-speedy-phenoms#comment-11192</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>yasin says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21111-amd-ships-two-new-speedy-phenoms#comment-11080</link>
			<description><![CDATA[for most games, by the time the cpu's are this good, the gpu or another component becomes the limiting factor.i would go for a 2/3 fps slower amd if it costs a fraction of the price of an intel equivalent, and so would most people.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>yasin</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 07 Dec 2010 23:30:56 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21111-amd-ships-two-new-speedy-phenoms#comment-11080</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>nECrO says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21111-amd-ships-two-new-speedy-phenoms#comment-11049</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Exactly. The human eye can't tell the difference beyond 60 FPS, so you need a machine to tell you the difference because you can't see it! Well if I can't see something, I'm not paying for it. I will be rebuilding late next year, but for now I have a Phenom 8750 triple core and a new HD6870. My games look good and my rig is fast enough that I am competitive and have a good time playing. Lets see. My games look good and my rig is fast enough that I have a good time. Why do I want to spend extra $ on an Intel rig? To brag on some forum that my rig is faster than yours and "pwns"?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>nECrO</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 07 Dec 2010 18:26:41 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21111-amd-ships-two-new-speedy-phenoms#comment-11049</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>JAB Creations says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21111-amd-ships-two-new-speedy-phenoms#comment-11036</link>
			<description><![CDATA[i5 760? hahaha First both sockets 1156 and 1155 were/are dead before they shipped, neither will ever get more then four actual cores. Secondly all AM3 chips will plug in to AM3+ motherboards (not vice versa though) which is actually the best way, replace your AM3 with an AM3+ mobo & wait a few months for a new stepping 12 core Bulldozer beast and your upgrade costs will be much smoother. Also to go to an FX chipset you don't have to throw out your perfectly good AMD chip. Plus it's about playable FPS, anything beyond 60 (60Hz) is a waste of money.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>JAB Creations</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 07 Dec 2010 17:36:50 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21111-amd-ships-two-new-speedy-phenoms#comment-11036</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Jurassic1024 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21111-amd-ships-two-new-speedy-phenoms#comment-11026</link>
			<description><![CDATA[But instantly you could megatask like nobodies business. And dont forget multi GPU setups.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Jurassic1024</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 07 Dec 2010 16:36:37 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21111-amd-ships-two-new-speedy-phenoms#comment-11026</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Jurassic1024 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21111-amd-ships-two-new-speedy-phenoms#comment-11025</link>
			<description><![CDATA[except in those 2-3 years, the i5 760 @ 4GHz will continue to stomp that chip.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Jurassic1024</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 07 Dec 2010 16:34:59 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21111-amd-ships-two-new-speedy-phenoms#comment-11025</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>AndreiD says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21111-amd-ships-two-new-speedy-phenoms#comment-11014</link>
			<description><![CDATA[The difference is usually 5 to 10 fps, what are we talking about here? Can you notice 5 or 10 fps when you already have 80+ ? No. And I gave you a link where the Thurbans outperform the i7 930 in Dirt2 so I presume there's a video game version difference between the two reviews. Sure, if you're a hardcore gamer you can go with an i5/i7, but you're repeating the same things people said when the first Quad Cores appeared and were outperformed by the Dual Cores. It took the video game industry 1-2 years before the first properly multithreaded titles appeared.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>AndreiD</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 07 Dec 2010 15:19:05 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21111-amd-ships-two-new-speedy-phenoms#comment-11014</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
