<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Cedar trail Atom hints at DX 10.1 graphics</title>
		<description>Discuss Cedar trail Atom hints at DX 10.1 graphics</description>
		<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21089-cedar-trail-atom-hints-at-dx-101-graphics</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 09:30:03 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.fudzilla.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_k2/21089/10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>godrilla says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21089-cedar-trail-atom-hints-at-dx-101-graphics#comment-10942</link>
			<description><![CDATA[directx11 brought shader 5 or compute shader that will be utilized in programs like IE9, you have to look at the whole picture not just the gaming aspect, they are trying to compete with AMD not only because of gaming, but because of the power of the GPU kills the Moore's law theory that Intel goes by! (its multiplication Vs exponential growth)]]></description>
			<dc:creator>godrilla</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 07 Dec 2010 01:32:37 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21089-cedar-trail-atom-hints-at-dx-101-graphics#comment-10942</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>godrilla says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21089-cedar-trail-atom-hints-at-dx-101-graphics#comment-10940</link>
			<description><![CDATA[And they they wonder why AMD is a better candidate for next gen consoles? ( dx11 all the way fuzed using 28nm chips)]]></description>
			<dc:creator>godrilla</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 07 Dec 2010 01:25:57 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21089-cedar-trail-atom-hints-at-dx-101-graphics#comment-10940</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>ghelyar says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21089-cedar-trail-atom-hints-at-dx-101-graphics#comment-10921</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Matroska (MKV) is a container format, not a codec. There is nothing to accelerate. It is common for a H.264 video stream to be inside a MKV container, for example, but the container itself is just how the streams are laid out in the file.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>ghelyar</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 06 Dec 2010 18:54:51 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21089-cedar-trail-atom-hints-at-dx-101-graphics#comment-10921</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>thomasg says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21089-cedar-trail-atom-hints-at-dx-101-graphics#comment-10910</link>
			<description><![CDATA[There's no point in supporting dx11 because they know it couldn't run any dx11 game at acceptable framerates. So rather than just include it as another feature they can say it "supports," they just left it out. I can't really blame them for that, but wow they can't build an IGP that supports dx11 2 and a half years after its debut?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>thomasg</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 06 Dec 2010 17:31:42 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21089-cedar-trail-atom-hints-at-dx-101-graphics#comment-10910</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Nerdfighter says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21089-cedar-trail-atom-hints-at-dx-101-graphics#comment-10898</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Of course Nvidia had to be mentioned, otherwise it's not an article by Fudo. What the hell does Nvidia have to do with integrated graphics? It's not like new ION's are coming any time soon. If an Intel Atom can process 1080p, that's pretty impressive. Especially if it can run fanless. Perfect for HTPC-purposes.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Nerdfighter</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 06 Dec 2010 16:08:00 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21089-cedar-trail-atom-hints-at-dx-101-graphics#comment-10898</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Wolfdale says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21089-cedar-trail-atom-hints-at-dx-101-graphics#comment-10874</link>
			<description><![CDATA[well even if they didnt need it, it would be nice to say "our intel atom cpu can do more than a ps3 and xbox360" have fun with directx 9.0b !! specially with the bluray2.0, its bye bye but seriously, i think the biggest reason is that dx11 is mostly used for pumping out large quantities of tesselation, and for that, you dont really want a atom anyway, if you put dx10.1 and dx 11 side by side, i think ... for an atom.... dx11 doesnt have much more to offer than dx10.1 so why should you waste resources on development and production of a dx11 enabled chip while you wont even use it if you want to pump out bigtime dx11 graphics, get a cheap radeon in your atom htpc :)]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Wolfdale</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 06 Dec 2010 14:22:51 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21089-cedar-trail-atom-hints-at-dx-101-graphics#comment-10874</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>hellfire says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21089-cedar-trail-atom-hints-at-dx-101-graphics#comment-10862</link>
			<description><![CDATA[why would they need DX10.1?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>hellfire</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 06 Dec 2010 12:53:21 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21089-cedar-trail-atom-hints-at-dx-101-graphics#comment-10862</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
