<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Nvidia keenly promotes multi-core Tegras</title>
		<description>Discuss Nvidia keenly promotes multi-core Tegras</description>
		<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21077-nvidia-keenly-promotes-multi-core-tegras</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 13:36:04 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.fudzilla.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_k2/21077/10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>Serge says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21077-nvidia-keenly-promotes-multi-core-tegras#comment-10849</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I am more excited about Mali than Tegra. But I am quite sure Tegra can outperform most, if not all, currently available mobile devices.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Serge</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 05 Dec 2010 10:41:27 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21077-nvidia-keenly-promotes-multi-core-tegras#comment-10849</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>fusion says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21077-nvidia-keenly-promotes-multi-core-tegras#comment-10848</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I feel I want to buy ARM soon nvidia Kepler in the series used to get dual cpu ARM]]></description>
			<dc:creator>fusion</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 05 Dec 2010 10:26:40 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21077-nvidia-keenly-promotes-multi-core-tegras#comment-10848</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>hoohoo says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21077-nvidia-keenly-promotes-multi-core-tegras#comment-10846</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@AndromedaB (2) I guess I should also recognize that ARM is not alone in the low power consumption media player market segment. MIPS does well there, as do PPC designs.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>hoohoo</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 05 Dec 2010 08:56:33 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21077-nvidia-keenly-promotes-multi-core-tegras#comment-10846</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>hoohoo says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21077-nvidia-keenly-promotes-multi-core-tegras#comment-10845</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@AndromedaB If low power consumption is a design criterion ARM designs should win (and Tegra is an ARM design FWIW). AMD knows this, bobcat is at least nominally synthesizable and targeted at low power consumption. I worry that bobcat is not quite low power consumption enough nor synthesizable enough. AMD/Intel seem stuck in the general purpose CPU model, trying to wedge that model into the cellphone and commodity media player market. Network attached media players that display on a TV (Apple TV, ASUS O!Play, WDTV etc) are a case in point: they don't really need, say, advanced FP processing... just good enough processing. But I think bobcat will do well in the thin/light notebook market. That would be a step ahead for AMD.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>hoohoo</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 05 Dec 2010 08:52:49 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21077-nvidia-keenly-promotes-multi-core-tegras#comment-10845</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>tekken says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21077-nvidia-keenly-promotes-multi-core-tegras#comment-10831</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Is it so hard to spend 5 minutes proof reading an article, or at least bothering to write something that makes sense?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>tekken</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 04 Dec 2010 10:15:26 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21077-nvidia-keenly-promotes-multi-core-tegras#comment-10831</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>AndromedaB says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21077-nvidia-keenly-promotes-multi-core-tegras#comment-10829</link>
			<description><![CDATA[i think (and hope) arm will beat out x86 in the mobile/tablet markets. they are just cheaper and more power efficient. i worry that amd might go with it if they dont act soon thouhg the apu was a good move as for seing their mobile igp i don think they had much of a choice... they're broke.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>AndromedaB</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 04 Dec 2010 07:02:30 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21077-nvidia-keenly-promotes-multi-core-tegras#comment-10829</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>AndreiD says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21077-nvidia-keenly-promotes-multi-core-tegras#comment-10813</link>
			<description><![CDATA[You do know AMD is making something called "Fusion" right? Which in a couple of years will make it's way into tablets too.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>AndreiD</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2010 19:49:15 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21077-nvidia-keenly-promotes-multi-core-tegras#comment-10813</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>AndromedaB says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21077-nvidia-keenly-promotes-multi-core-tegras#comment-10780</link>
			<description><![CDATA[lol who else giggled at the last sentence Tegras could offer an unparalleled gaming experience on mobile devices but i thought the gaming experience was all about parallel ;)]]></description>
			<dc:creator>AndromedaB</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2010 17:10:41 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21077-nvidia-keenly-promotes-multi-core-tegras#comment-10780</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>guideX says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21077-nvidia-keenly-promotes-multi-core-tegras#comment-10771</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Great idea by AMD to sell their mobile IGP dept to Qualcomm.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>guideX</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2010 14:34:10 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21077-nvidia-keenly-promotes-multi-core-tegras#comment-10771</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
