<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Mobile phone industry too slow for new hardware</title>
		<description>Discuss Mobile phone industry too slow for new hardware</description>
		<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21029-mobile-phone-industry-too-slow-for-new-hardware</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 08:28:00 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.fudzilla.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_k2/21029/10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>yasin says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21029-mobile-phone-industry-too-slow-for-new-hardware#comment-10567</link>
			<description><![CDATA[if you have pentium in your pc i feel really sorry for you. the solution is simple, if you don't need a 1GHz CPU, don't buy one. both cores aren't used all the time either, only when needed.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>yasin</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2010 19:02:05 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21029-mobile-phone-industry-too-slow-for-new-hardware#comment-10567</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>DJDestiny says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21029-mobile-phone-industry-too-slow-for-new-hardware#comment-10550</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Even the CPU industry is the same , The new Phenoms Have a Lower TDP then last gen Athlons ( the high end ones of course ) And can do things much faster ( well duh )]]></description>
			<dc:creator>DJDestiny</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2010 17:48:14 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21029-mobile-phone-industry-too-slow-for-new-hardware#comment-10550</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Exodite says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21029-mobile-phone-industry-too-slow-for-new-hardware#comment-10546</link>
			<description><![CDATA[It seems my previous reply were gobbled up by the ether so I'll try again... That's not how it works, a more powerful processor is always preferable unless idle power draw is significantly higher. Since the workload is very rarely temporally uniform but rather coming in bursts depending upon usage it's preferable with a stronger processor as it can finish the workload faster and thus spend more time in an idle state than a weaker alternative would. Check out articles on Anandtech or THG that demonstrates this if you like.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Exodite</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2010 16:21:10 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21029-mobile-phone-industry-too-slow-for-new-hardware#comment-10546</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Jaberwocky says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21029-mobile-phone-industry-too-slow-for-new-hardware#comment-10544</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Actualy the most power hungry element of a Mobile phone is a User with to much time on his hands.Surfing the net.WIFI on,Music on and watching video's all the time. :lol:]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Jaberwocky</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2010 15:56:20 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21029-mobile-phone-industry-too-slow-for-new-hardware#comment-10544</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Wolfesteinabhi says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21029-mobile-phone-industry-too-slow-for-new-hardware#comment-10538</link>
			<description><![CDATA[.its like if tasks works perfectly on a celeron why should i go for pentium or corei7 (for the case cortex A9 might be eating lesser power then A8 ..but thats not always the case with newer CPUS...with more power come more battery hunger ;) ) performance per watt might be improved in new cpus but ...what if i just dont need 1Ghz processor and can do away with 200Mhz one which overall eats less power regardless of performance per watt]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Wolfesteinabhi</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2010 15:09:53 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21029-mobile-phone-industry-too-slow-for-new-hardware#comment-10538</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Wolfesteinabhi says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21029-mobile-phone-industry-too-slow-for-new-hardware#comment-10537</link>
			<description><![CDATA[yeah ..sure other parts especially the display HOGS all the battery power..but i was talking about just the CPU ....]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Wolfesteinabhi</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2010 15:09:18 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21029-mobile-phone-industry-too-slow-for-new-hardware#comment-10537</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Exodite says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21029-mobile-phone-industry-too-slow-for-new-hardware#comment-10535</link>
			<description><![CDATA[This misinformation is getting tiresome. The SoC is by far not the most power-hungry part of a mobile system. Indeed Cortex A9 dual-cores will require less power to do the same amount of work as a Cortex A8 single-core. If you want better battery life, and don't we all, you should start pointing fingers at the displays, radio units and to a lesser extent storage as that's where the real power drain lies.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Exodite</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2010 14:51:54 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21029-mobile-phone-industry-too-slow-for-new-hardware#comment-10535</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>DJDestiny says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21029-mobile-phone-industry-too-slow-for-new-hardware#comment-10529</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Where's windows ? Windows CE Kernel 5.0 - 7.0 is able to tame 4 cores .]]></description>
			<dc:creator>DJDestiny</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2010 14:35:08 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21029-mobile-phone-industry-too-slow-for-new-hardware#comment-10529</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>hellfire says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21029-mobile-phone-industry-too-slow-for-new-hardware#comment-10522</link>
			<description><![CDATA[agreed with you, i was talking with "consumption is the same" flag up :D still i dont know if thats true]]></description>
			<dc:creator>hellfire</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2010 13:55:42 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21029-mobile-phone-industry-too-slow-for-new-hardware#comment-10522</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Wolfesteinabhi says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21029-mobile-phone-industry-too-slow-for-new-hardware#comment-10520</link>
			<description><![CDATA[its not who has the MOST POWER HUNGRY CPU!!!...but the most efficient and "sufficient" are the ones that WIN this mobile game :P]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Wolfesteinabhi</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2010 13:49:31 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21029-mobile-phone-industry-too-slow-for-new-hardware#comment-10520</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
