<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Intel confirms accelerators in Sandy Bridge</title>
		<description>Discuss Intel confirms accelerators in Sandy Bridge</description>
		<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21019-intel-confirms-accelerators-in-sandy-bridge</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 01:11:53 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.fudzilla.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_k2/21019/10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>loadwick says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21019-intel-confirms-accelerators-in-sandy-bridge#comment-10824</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Does anyone know what the deal is with RAM Voltages on Sandy Bridge? I am not sure if Intel sorted it out already but i remember that you couldn't push RAM Voltages past 1.65v on previous Intel chips, is it the same with Sandy Bridge? Most DDR3 kits are at 1.65v those days anyway but there are still some nice high frequency, low latencies kits that require 1.9v.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>loadwick</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2010 23:42:05 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21019-intel-confirms-accelerators-in-sandy-bridge#comment-10824</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>DJDestiny says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21019-intel-confirms-accelerators-in-sandy-bridge#comment-10624</link>
			<description><![CDATA[And to add on , these "add-on" execution units are just like stream processors , but much much worser performance . Their 12 Execution units aren't even comparable to 3 SP's ( By AMD )]]></description>
			<dc:creator>DJDestiny</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 01 Dec 2010 15:54:03 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21019-intel-confirms-accelerators-in-sandy-bridge#comment-10624</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>The_Countess says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21019-intel-confirms-accelerators-in-sandy-bridge#comment-10581</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ALL gpu's that support dx9 and upwards CAN support openCL. its just a question of implementing drivers. and no guaranties for the performance of course.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>The_Countess</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2010 21:28:26 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21019-intel-confirms-accelerators-in-sandy-bridge#comment-10581</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Bl0bb3r says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21019-intel-confirms-accelerators-in-sandy-bridge#comment-10575</link>
			<description><![CDATA[YES, you troll too much.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Bl0bb3r</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2010 19:56:01 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21019-intel-confirms-accelerators-in-sandy-bridge#comment-10575</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Naterm says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21019-intel-confirms-accelerators-in-sandy-bridge#comment-10573</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Probably not. Anandtech's SNB coverage indicated that they'd have fixed function video encoding hardware onboard. In other words, it's probably not the GPU. While intel's graphics do indeed suck, you have to look at the performance increase between generations. They may get somewhere in a few years. Intel could definitely build a powerful GPU, but I think trying with x86 was a bad idea. They try to shoehorn that ISA into places it's not fit to go.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Naterm</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2010 19:42:37 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21019-intel-confirms-accelerators-in-sandy-bridge#comment-10573</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>yasin says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21019-intel-confirms-accelerators-in-sandy-bridge#comment-10560</link>
			<description><![CDATA[well it is intel after all.their gma chips hardly set the world alight.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>yasin</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2010 18:47:06 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21019-intel-confirms-accelerators-in-sandy-bridge#comment-10560</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>dicobalt says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21019-intel-confirms-accelerators-in-sandy-bridge#comment-10548</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Media acceleration circuitry = shitty integrated graphics]]></description>
			<dc:creator>dicobalt</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2010 17:35:06 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21019-intel-confirms-accelerators-in-sandy-bridge#comment-10548</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>DJDestiny says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21019-intel-confirms-accelerators-in-sandy-bridge#comment-10531</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Those are execution units not pipelines .]]></description>
			<dc:creator>DJDestiny</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2010 14:42:58 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21019-intel-confirms-accelerators-in-sandy-bridge#comment-10531</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Tr0y says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21019-intel-confirms-accelerators-in-sandy-bridge#comment-10516</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Wrong. I just did some research. Sandy Bridge uses Intel GMA HD Graphics 100 / HD Graphics 200 which has 6/12 pixel pipelines. And supports OpenCL 1.1 So the answer to my own question is: YES :)]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Tr0y</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2010 13:23:02 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21019-intel-confirms-accelerators-in-sandy-bridge#comment-10516</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Bl0bb3r says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21019-intel-confirms-accelerators-in-sandy-bridge#comment-10512</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Their GPU's aren't programmable... so the answer is no. Also DirectX 11 features DirectCompute. If they would have supported OpenCL on GPU then by any definition they would also support DC or at least the DC version that runs on DirectX 10, hinting at GPGPU or a dumbed down version of GPGPU for such a graphics chip.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Bl0bb3r</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2010 13:00:35 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21019-intel-confirms-accelerators-in-sandy-bridge#comment-10512</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
