<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Futuremark 3DMark 11 dated </title>
		<description>Discuss Futuremark 3DMark 11 dated </description>
		<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20940-futuremark-3dmark-11-dated</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 05:55:32 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.fudzilla.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_k2/20940/10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>loadwick says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20940-futuremark-3dmark-11-dated#comment-9911</link>
			<description><![CDATA[The sad truth is we will only see games looking that good about a year or two after the release of the PS4 and Xbox720. No developers are going to spend the kind of money needed in a full game just for the odd few super high end PC gamers. There is hardly any money in PC gaming so developers only make games as detailed as current consoles can handle. nVidia's TWIMTBP does help a bit and we get some AA, higher res and more detailed textures but thats about it. But 3DMark 11 shows what games could look like today but when you look at what we are playing its pretty sad. Fingers crossed that Crysis 2 hasn't been too crippled by being made for consoles.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>loadwick</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 22 Nov 2010 23:34:33 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20940-futuremark-3dmark-11-dated#comment-9911</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>PainPig says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20940-futuremark-3dmark-11-dated#comment-9896</link>
			<description><![CDATA[There are so many free benchmark programs out there, who cares about the one you have to pay for!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>PainPig</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 22 Nov 2010 20:30:56 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20940-futuremark-3dmark-11-dated#comment-9896</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Runadumb says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20940-futuremark-3dmark-11-dated#comment-9888</link>
			<description><![CDATA[See the difference the foliage moving in the jungle scene makes? Glad they sorted that out as when it was perfectly still it just looked wrong.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Runadumb</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 22 Nov 2010 19:42:07 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20940-futuremark-3dmark-11-dated#comment-9888</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>yasin says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20940-futuremark-3dmark-11-dated#comment-9886</link>
			<description><![CDATA[next year, you might get this, but not in a game, just you can explore this utopia. but i think perhaps 2012, or 2013, we should be seeing games close to this.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>yasin</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 22 Nov 2010 19:26:49 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20940-futuremark-3dmark-11-dated#comment-9886</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Jaberwocky says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20940-futuremark-3dmark-11-dated#comment-9861</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Err... Possibly Crysis 2 due out next year.Hopefully]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Jaberwocky</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 22 Nov 2010 17:00:47 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20940-futuremark-3dmark-11-dated#comment-9861</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>loadwick says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20940-futuremark-3dmark-11-dated#comment-9850</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I think its great that we are now rendering cut scenes in real time but that's all they seem to be at the moment, cut scenes and tech demos. When will we see actual games looking like this?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>loadwick</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 22 Nov 2010 16:00:16 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20940-futuremark-3dmark-11-dated#comment-9850</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>yourma2000 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20940-futuremark-3dmark-11-dated#comment-9842</link>
			<description><![CDATA[favourite part has to be 0:37, the tess I'm not sure how they would go about optimizing benchmark programs for computer cases, but yeah I get the point of advertising computer hardware and peripherals in futuremark software, I remember seeing the Sapphire logo in 3Dmarkvantage on the back of that boat/plane thingy, was a little confused when I first saw it, on a slightly relative note, my favourite part has to be 0:37, the tessellation looks incredibly detailed!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>yourma2000</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 22 Nov 2010 15:18:23 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20940-futuremark-3dmark-11-dated#comment-9842</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>leftiszi says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20940-futuremark-3dmark-11-dated#comment-9840</link>
			<description><![CDATA[God I hope they have gone for 1080P for the extreme preset this time.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>leftiszi</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 22 Nov 2010 14:58:02 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20940-futuremark-3dmark-11-dated#comment-9840</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Steve-O says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20940-futuremark-3dmark-11-dated#comment-9833</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Also that it's probably not relevant either. Sure it's nice, but it's going to be optimized to the hilt for whatever company "paid" more.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Steve-O</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 22 Nov 2010 14:45:24 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20940-futuremark-3dmark-11-dated#comment-9833</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>yourma2000 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20940-futuremark-3dmark-11-dated#comment-9830</link>
			<description><![CDATA[it looks beautiful and lush, but then you see a giant Antec logo on the side of a car and at that moment you're reminded that it's not real :-|]]></description>
			<dc:creator>yourma2000</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 22 Nov 2010 14:26:52 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20940-futuremark-3dmark-11-dated#comment-9830</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
