<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Intel heads for Q4 2010 miss</title>
		<description>Discuss Intel heads for Q4 2010 miss</description>
		<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20926-intel-heads-for-q4-2010-miss</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 20:11:03 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.fudzilla.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_k2/20926/10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>Naterm says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20926-intel-heads-for-q4-2010-miss#comment-9805</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Ivy Bridge will work in the same sockets and motherboards as Sandy Bridge. There will likely be the same market segmentation as well. If you buy SNB, you can upgrade to IVB without a new motherboard. Intel's switching of sockets probably has between zero and no impact on their financials. 99% of the market doesn't care. No one outside of this crowd actually upgrades their CPU. It does create problems with certifying new hardware, but that can be overcome easily enough. Considering how well intel did with Nehalem and how much kit they sold, it's not surprising that they can't keep that level of performance up indefinitely. If their stock does drop, it might not be a bad time to buy some up.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Naterm</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 22 Nov 2010 12:11:38 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20926-intel-heads-for-q4-2010-miss#comment-9805</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>genetix says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20926-intel-heads-for-q4-2010-miss#comment-9791</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@loadwick I do not believe this is a popularity contest in any sense it's an public opinion of person X. As for the subject well, I don't think 22nm would solve anything unless it would of been added on top of 32nm chips where 32nm chip would of been same as 'Penryn' price when it came to market. The fact that we have nothing new out from Intel Corporation what we have is 1,5 times the core processing power against 3-5 times the cost. My current build has all other components in boxes except Intel CPUs simply because of their, if this continues I will return all Intel motherboards and move to AMD 1100T as it is well priced + has all new features against any Intel 45nm parts even 32nm parts with 6 real cores.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>genetix</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 22 Nov 2010 10:36:07 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20926-intel-heads-for-q4-2010-miss#comment-9791</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>loadwick says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20926-intel-heads-for-q4-2010-miss#comment-9788</link>
			<description><![CDATA[IMO, Intel controls what segments AMD wins. I know this will make me very unpopular on this site but again, IMO, Intel could have released Sandy Bridge much sooner than it is doing if they needed/wanted to, and i think they are pretty much ready with 22nm Ivy Bridge if they chose to be. They could definitely under-cut AMD at every price point if it was in their best interests as they use much smaller chips (32nm soon to be 22nm) and make their own chips. Also, I might be wrong but I seem to remember Intel injected a huge amount of cash into AMD a few years ago to keep them going for this very reason. This is not uncommon, Microsoft invested a huge amount in Apple many years ago to get them back up and running as they needed the completion to be healthy too.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>loadwick</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 22 Nov 2010 00:05:29 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20926-intel-heads-for-q4-2010-miss#comment-9788</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>loadwick says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20926-intel-heads-for-q4-2010-miss#comment-9787</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@ Genetix Totally agree. Intel are off their heads atm. But there might be some sense in it all. If you look at the crazy amount of money Intel have been making this year, tens of billions of Dollars, then they doing something right! But one thing Intel can definitely not afford is losing AMD as a rival. If AMD went under then Intel would have the monopolies commission on their back in a flash and get split up into separate companies, very bad news. So.... Continued....]]></description>
			<dc:creator>loadwick</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 22 Nov 2010 00:01:43 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20926-intel-heads-for-q4-2010-miss#comment-9787</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>genetix says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20926-intel-heads-for-q4-2010-miss#comment-9786</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Heck, I wanna post another comment also on subject. 2 years ago I changed my own system from AMD to Intel Penryn which was brand new processor Q9450 to be exact that 'TICK' cost us 300e/$ Q9300 was even cheaper. 2 years later as in now we are looking 'Westmere'/'Gulftown' cost is 3 times more than Penryn and we have absolutely nothing new except 600Mhz more clocks and of course more cores where half of even those are threaded.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>genetix</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 21 Nov 2010 22:09:49 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20926-intel-heads-for-q4-2010-miss#comment-9786</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>genetix says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20926-intel-heads-for-q4-2010-miss#comment-9784</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Well, intel pricing is terrible, atm, even I could say they are doing incredible bad result just because of it. People will not buy the product, if it's too expensive and as for the moment intel products are priced 3-5 times to AMD prices and they are no where near 3 times the speed (ex. X5650/970/980X etc). Q4/2010 doesn't seem to be very good for Intel. They better start selling processors and shouldn't even consider filling my socks with SSDs for chrismas as there still ain't a single resonable cost vs. performance processor on marker to buy from Intel. :)]]></description>
			<dc:creator>genetix</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 21 Nov 2010 21:55:10 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20926-intel-heads-for-q4-2010-miss#comment-9784</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>tekken says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20926-intel-heads-for-q4-2010-miss#comment-9697</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Technically that could be applied to any major (and minor really) financial institution. Credit/capital markets are basically glorified gambling institutions, so one has to take anything any "analyst" says with a rock mountain of salt. I think there is no other profession out there were being wrong pays as well as in the financial sector.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>tekken</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 19 Nov 2010 23:58:53 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20926-intel-heads-for-q4-2010-miss#comment-9697</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>NidStyles says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20926-intel-heads-for-q4-2010-miss#comment-9654</link>
			<description><![CDATA[J.P. Morgan? The same firm that's been recently padding the sales of Silver in order to keep the price artificially low, that J.P. Morgan? Yeah, I would take their advise with less than a grain of salt, it's obvious they are not beyond stretching the truth to their own end's. Fud - check the credibility of your sources FFS. If they have something to gain from making the comment, it's probably BS.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>NidStyles</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 19 Nov 2010 17:29:54 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20926-intel-heads-for-q4-2010-miss#comment-9654</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>fudo says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20926-intel-heads-for-q4-2010-miss#comment-9627</link>
			<description><![CDATA[it will need a new chipset, so I am guessing even if socket stays the same, you will need a new board.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>fudo</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 19 Nov 2010 13:17:09 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20926-intel-heads-for-q4-2010-miss#comment-9627</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>milkod2001 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20926-intel-heads-for-q4-2010-miss#comment-9619</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Ivy Bridge should use the same socket 1155 for lowend,mainstre am and 2011 for high end, same as SB]]></description>
			<dc:creator>milkod2001</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 19 Nov 2010 12:55:51 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20926-intel-heads-for-q4-2010-miss#comment-9619</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
