<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Hacker claims to have cracked AMD chips</title>
		<description>Discuss Hacker claims to have cracked AMD chips</description>
		<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20881-hacker-claims-to-have-cracked-amd-chips</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 21:03:16 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.fudzilla.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_k2/20881/10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>GrumpyOldMan says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20881-hacker-claims-to-have-cracked-amd-chips#comment-9450</link>
			<description><![CDATA[AMD as wells as Intel have product updates for their CPU's. Most of us take it for granted and never do so. Probably because there is little need or choice of updates to microcode validation. IFF this guy is correct, there might be an exploit for use in deep web. .]]></description>
			<dc:creator>GrumpyOldMan</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 17 Nov 2010 16:30:53 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20881-hacker-claims-to-have-cracked-amd-chips#comment-9450</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>guideX says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20881-hacker-claims-to-have-cracked-amd-chips#comment-9404</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Looks like Intel leaked its internal memo's again. :D]]></description>
			<dc:creator>guideX</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 17 Nov 2010 04:53:58 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20881-hacker-claims-to-have-cracked-amd-chips#comment-9404</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Wolfdale says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20881-hacker-claims-to-have-cracked-amd-chips#comment-9382</link>
			<description><![CDATA[on the other hand, the ability to reverse engineer amd cpu's might also bring a dangerous threat on virus attacks? im not sure about how deep this goes, but i can imagine some evil genius writing a code that ruins your cpu? is that even possible with these build in functions? //edit it might also be part of the default setting amd sells a chip at? like a phenom x3 thats actually a way faster one, and x4 on top thats simply locked down to 3x i know you can use some bios fixes to do this, but who knows what those vague options can reveal if their actually true that is]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Wolfdale</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2010 23:00:27 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20881-hacker-claims-to-have-cracked-amd-chips#comment-9382</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>yasin says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20881-hacker-claims-to-have-cracked-amd-chips#comment-9371</link>
			<description><![CDATA[the link looks pretty dodgy to me.look at all the exclamation marks.looks a bit childish imo]]></description>
			<dc:creator>yasin</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2010 21:13:48 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20881-hacker-claims-to-have-cracked-amd-chips#comment-9371</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Bl0bb3r says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20881-hacker-claims-to-have-cracked-amd-chips#comment-9366</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Actually, if GCC team would have access to this... and not only them... we might see killer AMD specific optimizations in compilers. It's one thing to get some optimizations from an AMD official and implement them and it's another thing to get your hands dirty and make your compiler work as you know its inner workins. Kinda like intel compiler works and it has all of these optimizations... bet intel has such a debug system as well.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Bl0bb3r</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2010 20:36:26 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20881-hacker-claims-to-have-cracked-amd-chips#comment-9366</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>nele says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20881-hacker-claims-to-have-cracked-amd-chips#comment-9358</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Nothing. But it allows the Chinese to make Athlon XP knockoffs. :-*]]></description>
			<dc:creator>nele</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2010 19:23:41 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20881-hacker-claims-to-have-cracked-amd-chips#comment-9358</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Regenweald says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20881-hacker-claims-to-have-cracked-amd-chips#comment-9341</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Well I'm not at the level where this would be of any use to me. So i'll wait and see. :lol:]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Regenweald</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2010 18:13:37 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20881-hacker-claims-to-have-cracked-amd-chips#comment-9341</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>thomasg says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20881-hacker-claims-to-have-cracked-amd-chips#comment-9340</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Sounds like jibberish to me, what exactly does this allow us to do?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>thomasg</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2010 18:12:54 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20881-hacker-claims-to-have-cracked-amd-chips#comment-9340</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
