<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Intel slashes SSD pricing</title>
		<description>Discuss Intel slashes SSD pricing</description>
		<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20863-intel-slashes-ssd-pricing</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 20:06:04 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.fudzilla.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_k2/20863/10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>crackerz says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20863-intel-slashes-ssd-pricing#comment-17087</link>
			<description><![CDATA[No worries, everyone is learning some point in his life. If you are old enough and know from BIOS settings you'll already know that its refresh rate, as you could change the SDRAM's refresh rate from normal(7ns) to 5ns(turbo) but with economy sdram that was creating stability issues(BSOD).]]></description>
			<dc:creator>crackerz</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2011 17:51:03 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20863-intel-slashes-ssd-pricing#comment-17087</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Naterm says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20863-intel-slashes-ssd-pricing#comment-17084</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I always thought that it was recharge, since it's dealing with capacitance. Learn something all the time.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Naterm</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2011 17:41:43 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20863-intel-slashes-ssd-pricing#comment-17084</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>crackerz says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20863-intel-slashes-ssd-pricing#comment-17083</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Well the technical term is 'refresh rate" hahahaha and one definition about refresh rate is "the number of times every second that the data in a dynamic RAM chip has to be read and rewritten". I'm having a computer shop and I myself finished a university in the uk about this thinks(computin g). Have a nice day from the far far Greece.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>crackerz</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2011 17:34:04 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20863-intel-slashes-ssd-pricing#comment-17083</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Naterm says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20863-intel-slashes-ssd-pricing#comment-17071</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I wouldn't call what DRAM has a refresh rate, I'm not sure the technical term for it. The capacitance runs down and has to be recharged. Anyway, NAND and other non-volatile memory technologies are quite a bit different from DRAM, so you're right on the big point.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Naterm</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2011 15:18:15 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20863-intel-slashes-ssd-pricing#comment-17071</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>crackerz says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20863-intel-slashes-ssd-pricing#comment-17062</link>
			<description><![CDATA[So to get that straight, you are saying that RAM & ROM are practically very similar. No offense man but you need to work on learning about Volatile and Non-Volatile memory. Almost nothing similar. Examples: Ram?..write/read unlimited(fast, lowest access time) Rom?or its successor flash,bad read/write(low access time)..noways with hardware raid channels-internal raid(8, 10 or more)we have GREAT speeds but ALWAYS&I mean ALWAYS the writes MUST be preprogrammed so a flash memory must know how much write will do in its life, after that it does read ONLY&cannot write. So what similarities do you find? cause I can't find anything apart that both are recognized as "memory"]]></description>
			<dc:creator>crackerz</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2011 12:26:06 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20863-intel-slashes-ssd-pricing#comment-17062</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>loadwick says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20863-intel-slashes-ssd-pricing#comment-17046</link>
			<description><![CDATA[lol, why have you been reading an article from November 2010? I had forgotten i had even written that. I wouldn't call RAM and flash memory 'apples and oranges' though. Yes they have their differences but its mainly just the way they are written and erased at the block or byte level.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>loadwick</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2011 00:54:48 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20863-intel-slashes-ssd-pricing#comment-17046</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>crackerz says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20863-intel-slashes-ssd-pricing#comment-17038</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Loadwick don't compare oranges with apples. Ram has refresh rate.. different kind of connection(unti l 2015 we might see DDR5 and in graphics department GDDR7), so the short question is yes its much harder]]></description>
			<dc:creator>crackerz</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2011 19:54:20 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20863-intel-slashes-ssd-pricing#comment-17038</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>loadwick says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20863-intel-slashes-ssd-pricing#comment-10240</link>
			<description><![CDATA[http://www.fudzilla.com/memory/item/19953-next-generation-ddr4-sdram-reaches-over-4ghz-speeds Why will it take until 2015 to get RAM down to 25nm? Intel has 25nm SSDs out already, is it really that much harder to make RAM or is it just because Intel doesn't make RAM and everyone else is years behind?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>loadwick</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 26 Nov 2010 03:04:31 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20863-intel-slashes-ssd-pricing#comment-10240</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Naterm says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20863-intel-slashes-ssd-pricing#comment-9508</link>
			<description><![CDATA[What is it with people that can't understand that SSDs are not for bulk storage? I'm not going to buy an SSD of any kind expecting to house my collection of Blu-Rays on it. They're for your operating system and your programs. This situation becomes a little bit more complicated when you're dealing with laptops. That said people who use only a laptop can usually lug a decent sized 2.5" external drive when they go on the road. If they have a high-end notebook like an Elitebook they can usually use two drives and with a Macbook Pro you can buy an adapter to mount an extra drive in the optical bay. It's not an insurmountable problem by any means.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Naterm</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 18 Nov 2010 10:10:42 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20863-intel-slashes-ssd-pricing#comment-9508</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>thomasg says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20863-intel-slashes-ssd-pricing#comment-9319</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Decent compared to other SSD's, but faster than any platter-based hard drive.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>thomasg</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2010 16:49:34 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20863-intel-slashes-ssd-pricing#comment-9319</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
