<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Entry level Radeon 6000 series in Q1 2011</title>
		<description>Discuss Entry level Radeon 6000 series in Q1 2011</description>
		<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20862-entry-level-radeon6000-series-in-q1-2011</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 00:48:28 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.fudzilla.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_k2/20862/10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>Haberlandt says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20862-entry-level-radeon6000-series-in-q1-2011#comment-9561</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ATI?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Haberlandt</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 18 Nov 2010 19:36:32 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20862-entry-level-radeon6000-series-in-q1-2011#comment-9561</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>thetruth says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20862-entry-level-radeon6000-series-in-q1-2011#comment-9257</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Why have you started talking about Nvidia chips in an ATI-based article?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>thetruth</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2010 09:08:45 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20862-entry-level-radeon6000-series-in-q1-2011#comment-9257</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>jonelsorel says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20862-entry-level-radeon6000-series-in-q1-2011#comment-9253</link>
			<description><![CDATA[You don't need to assume that for GTX 580 vs 480. It's a fact.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>jonelsorel</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2010 07:16:46 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20862-entry-level-radeon6000-series-in-q1-2011#comment-9253</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>nt300 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20862-entry-level-radeon6000-series-in-q1-2011#comment-9250</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Obviously you have no clue what you are talking about. To me it sounds like good cards for home theatre and moderate gaming.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>nt300</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2010 04:34:42 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20862-entry-level-radeon6000-series-in-q1-2011#comment-9250</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Steve-O says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20862-entry-level-radeon6000-series-in-q1-2011#comment-9215</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Well at least AMD doesn't seem to be delusional about release dates (any more). Hopefully there are some preliminary samples leaked to random Chinese websites sooner rather than later...]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Steve-O</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2010 16:55:18 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20862-entry-level-radeon6000-series-in-q1-2011#comment-9215</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Haberlandt says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20862-entry-level-radeon6000-series-in-q1-2011#comment-9209</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Caicos sounds better for a mainstream card while Turks should be the name for the GPU replacing Cedar. Redwood -> Caicos Cedar -> Turks :(]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Haberlandt</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2010 16:14:22 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20862-entry-level-radeon6000-series-in-q1-2011#comment-9209</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>AndromedaB says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20862-entry-level-radeon6000-series-in-q1-2011#comment-9202</link>
			<description><![CDATA[new as in slightly modified i assume]]></description>
			<dc:creator>AndromedaB</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2010 15:50:41 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20862-entry-level-radeon6000-series-in-q1-2011#comment-9202</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
