<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Trinity Fusion planned for 2012</title>
		<description>Discuss Trinity Fusion planned for 2012</description>
		<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20826-trinity-fusion-planned-for-2012</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 14:37:30 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.fudzilla.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_k2/20826/10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>loadwick says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20826-trinity-fusion-planned-for-2012#comment-8915</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@JAB Creations I second that, i love that Intel seem to be moving along at such a fast pace but AMD will get my money for the time being. Since AMD handed Intel their own ass with the Athlon64 I have never seen Intel so active. We now have 32nm, 6 core beasts running at 4GHz+. Just around the corner Sandy Bridge looks to clock easily over 5GHz and 22nm Ivy Bridge is still meant to be on track for 2H 2011! But AMD has the value for money catagory sown up. I have a quad core, running at 3.9GHz for £70, a great motherboard for £64 and a 4870 for £89! All brand new when i bought it over a year and half a go. I wouldn't get shit for that with Intel!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>loadwick</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 12 Nov 2010 02:52:05 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20826-trinity-fusion-planned-for-2012#comment-8915</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>JAB Creations says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20826-trinity-fusion-planned-for-2012#comment-8869</link>
			<description><![CDATA[AMD having a fighting chance? The article's Fuad writes are like, "Oh yeah, there's that other company that makes processors." Yeah that other company that gives us products are both awesome and affordable. When Intel stops screwing over their customers for say five years I might willingly buy an Intel based system though I don't see that happening, my Phenom II system kicks more then enough ass for what I do (lots of production and some gaming) and there's always the issues of having self-respect and taking your girlfriend out instead of blowing a grand on just a processor.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>JAB Creations</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 11 Nov 2010 20:22:21 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20826-trinity-fusion-planned-for-2012#comment-8869</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>thomasg says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20826-trinity-fusion-planned-for-2012#comment-8868</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I want to know why AMD be making 32nm processors in 2012 when they'll have 28nm graphics cards in mid 2011.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>thomasg</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 11 Nov 2010 20:16:42 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20826-trinity-fusion-planned-for-2012#comment-8868</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Blue Fear says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20826-trinity-fusion-planned-for-2012#comment-8817</link>
			<description><![CDATA[In another article Faud claimed Intel would be late to 22nm transition.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Blue Fear</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 11 Nov 2010 13:30:41 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20826-trinity-fusion-planned-for-2012#comment-8817</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>The_Countess says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20826-trinity-fusion-planned-for-2012#comment-8808</link>
			<description><![CDATA[because of the same reason its called a APU. even a medium sized gpu can do some things much faster then a 8 core cpu. physics en AI calculations come to mind. and instead of having to give up some of the performance of your discrete card you have a 2de card to do them on.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>The_Countess</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 11 Nov 2010 12:38:19 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20826-trinity-fusion-planned-for-2012#comment-8808</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>agent_47 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20826-trinity-fusion-planned-for-2012#comment-8804</link>
			<description><![CDATA[y do we need a 8core with grafix....if u have that much cash, u might as get a discrete.........]]></description>
			<dc:creator>agent_47</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 11 Nov 2010 12:00:48 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20826-trinity-fusion-planned-for-2012#comment-8804</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
