<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>3D could blow up in industry’s face</title>
		<description>Discuss 3D could blow up in industry’s face</description>
		<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20753-3d-could-blow-up-in-industry’s-face</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 17:51:01 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.fudzilla.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_k2/20753/10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>kartikkg says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20753-3d-could-blow-up-in-industry’s-face#comment-8279</link>
			<description><![CDATA[well wait for some time a research will show that watching 3D for hours will cause eye brain and etc etc tumor cancers etc etc :)]]></description>
			<dc:creator>kartikkg</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2010 13:28:00 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20753-3d-could-blow-up-in-industry’s-face#comment-8279</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>arclight says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20753-3d-could-blow-up-in-industry’s-face#comment-8197</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Am i the only guy who hates 3D? I think it's just a gimmik. I'd prefer they concentrate in making better quality monitors and TVs rather than adding 3D.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>arclight</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 07 Nov 2010 20:55:14 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20753-3d-could-blow-up-in-industry’s-face#comment-8197</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Jaybot says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20753-3d-could-blow-up-in-industry’s-face#comment-8119</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Hey, here's a thought, how about they figure out how to get decent sound out of those flat screen POS's. I couldn't care less about 3D and it's impractical to always run the sound through a receiver.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Jaybot</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 06 Nov 2010 21:32:36 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20753-3d-could-blow-up-in-industry’s-face#comment-8119</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>usr says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20753-3d-could-blow-up-in-industry’s-face#comment-8054</link>
			<description><![CDATA[There have been 3D movie fads roughly every 10 or 20 years since the 1930ies or so. Even then they already had polarized projection in full color, which is still pretty much state of the art. So neither the attempt (yet another...) nor it's possible failure comes as a big surprise. Granted, this iteration of the 3D fad has a big advantage, namely the inclusion of the home entertainment market. Here, early-adopters are always eager to have an excuse for replacing their previous rig, which makes it quite easy to push sub-par features based on novelty. Does does this grant automatic success, is the time finally right for the same stereoscopics that failed so many times before? Much money has been bet on this assumption, but that too has happened before.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>usr</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 05 Nov 2010 19:10:06 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20753-3d-could-blow-up-in-industry’s-face#comment-8054</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>yasin says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20753-3d-could-blow-up-in-industry’s-face#comment-8048</link>
			<description><![CDATA[the demand isn't there because its too expensive.and its expensive because its not ready for the mass market yet.i know one guy who has Sky 3D and a 3D TV, and thats because he is rolling in money.until 3d becomes easily accessible to the mass market, there will never be enough demand.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>yasin</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 05 Nov 2010 18:21:07 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20753-3d-could-blow-up-in-industry’s-face#comment-8048</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Nooblet says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20753-3d-could-blow-up-in-industry’s-face#comment-8019</link>
			<description><![CDATA[all he needs to show is the difference between 2D and 3D pr0n. that's what all visual entertainment gadgets are made for.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Nooblet</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 05 Nov 2010 16:10:33 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20753-3d-could-blow-up-in-industry’s-face#comment-8019</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>hoohoo says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20753-3d-could-blow-up-in-industry’s-face#comment-8012</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Yeah, it'll blow up, because nobody will pay extra for it.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>hoohoo</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 05 Nov 2010 15:20:06 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20753-3d-could-blow-up-in-industry’s-face#comment-8012</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>East17 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20753-3d-could-blow-up-in-industry’s-face#comment-8008</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Useless tech for now. I'm glad developers paid heaps of money to their people to deliver it and not gathered that money for the stock owners :) . At least the workers got paid and not that fat owners. Now let the owners take the cut :).]]></description>
			<dc:creator>East17</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 05 Nov 2010 15:12:37 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20753-3d-could-blow-up-in-industry’s-face#comment-8008</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>jonny80s says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20753-3d-could-blow-up-in-industry’s-face#comment-7996</link>
			<description><![CDATA[In the case of movies and TV it's a gimmick. Video games on the other hand... that is a completely different story. There's a market there, it adds to the realism of the first person environment. When they get to the goggle stage where there is a separate image for each eye combined with eye and head motion detection that can interpret where you are trying to look that will be the ultimate first person gaming environment. I believe we're only a year or two away from that.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>jonny80s</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 05 Nov 2010 13:57:28 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20753-3d-could-blow-up-in-industry’s-face#comment-7996</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>deadspeedv says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20753-3d-could-blow-up-in-industry’s-face#comment-7993</link>
			<description><![CDATA[[quote name="Blacky"]I like 3D overall, but for instance I wear glasses (I don't like contact lenses) and putting another pair of glasses on top of the ones I already have is simply ridiculous.[/quote You need special glasses that incorporates the two. Sounds like a new market sector.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>deadspeedv</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 05 Nov 2010 13:48:02 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20753-3d-could-blow-up-in-industry’s-face#comment-7993</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
