<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Lowest TDP for new Core i3 is 35W</title>
		<description>Discuss Lowest TDP for new Core i3 is 35W</description>
		<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20698-lowest-tdp-for-new-core-i3-is-35w</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 00:16:54 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.fudzilla.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_k2/20698/10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>youserzero says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20698-lowest-tdp-for-new-core-i3-is-35w#comment-7684</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Pulls them out of thin air? Lollerblades/Roflcopters]]></description>
			<dc:creator>youserzero</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 03 Nov 2010 10:53:01 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20698-lowest-tdp-for-new-core-i3-is-35w#comment-7684</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>asmoma says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20698-lowest-tdp-for-new-core-i3-is-35w#comment-7659</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Bulldozer and Llano is 32 nm. And Ontario at 40 nm will compete with intel atom at 45 nm. And the difference in "nm" is less and less significant for every stage.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>asmoma</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 03 Nov 2010 00:22:32 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20698-lowest-tdp-for-new-core-i3-is-35w#comment-7659</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>JeeBee says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20698-lowest-tdp-for-new-core-i3-is-35w#comment-7651</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Zacate and Ontario will be 40nm from TSMC - their process has a very high transistor density compared to Intel's, even though Intel can get very small transistors and SRAM. These are probably shipping to OEMs now for product manufacturing. Llano will be out at the end of the 1H 2011. I don't know where you're getting your dates from.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>JeeBee</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 02 Nov 2010 22:41:46 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20698-lowest-tdp-for-new-core-i3-is-35w#comment-7651</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Bignon says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20698-lowest-tdp-for-new-core-i3-is-35w#comment-7627</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Are there some release dates, yet? I want to build a HTPC for my parents for x-mas and I think that would be the perfect CPU.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Bignon</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 02 Nov 2010 15:48:38 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20698-lowest-tdp-for-new-core-i3-is-35w#comment-7627</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>romulous says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20698-lowest-tdp-for-new-core-i3-is-35w#comment-7613</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Save the planet from.. ? It's more like, save us from the bankers who are running America. Yeah, one world government is the way to save the planet... :o]]></description>
			<dc:creator>romulous</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 02 Nov 2010 12:28:17 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20698-lowest-tdp-for-new-core-i3-is-35w#comment-7613</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>youserzero says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20698-lowest-tdp-for-new-core-i3-is-35w#comment-7586</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Since Athlon first appeared when had AMD had a process lead on intel? That is...unless of course you yourself dont know?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>youserzero</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 02 Nov 2010 07:07:14 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20698-lowest-tdp-for-new-core-i3-is-35w#comment-7586</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Tr0y says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20698-lowest-tdp-for-new-core-i3-is-35w#comment-7585</link>
			<description><![CDATA[you must be either a) very young or b) have a very short memory.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Tr0y</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 02 Nov 2010 06:47:37 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20698-lowest-tdp-for-new-core-i3-is-35w#comment-7585</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>3doog says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20698-lowest-tdp-for-new-core-i3-is-35w#comment-7582</link>
			<description><![CDATA[did someone even prove read this thing?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>3doog</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 02 Nov 2010 06:01:00 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20698-lowest-tdp-for-new-core-i3-is-35w#comment-7582</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>youserzero says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20698-lowest-tdp-for-new-core-i3-is-35w#comment-7576</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I hate to be captain obvious, but Intel has always had a process lead over AMD. How exactly is that all of a sudden going to make a difference now?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>youserzero</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 02 Nov 2010 00:25:46 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20698-lowest-tdp-for-new-core-i3-is-35w#comment-7576</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>BernardP says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20698-lowest-tdp-for-new-core-i3-is-35w#comment-7572</link>
			<description><![CDATA[With its considerable lead over AMD, soon a full two generations with the release of Sandy Bridge, Intel is in a position of force. This could easily translate into very unpleasant pricing for the whole Sandy Bridge line.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>BernardP</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 01 Nov 2010 23:34:13 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20698-lowest-tdp-for-new-core-i3-is-35w#comment-7572</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
