<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Ivy Bridge 22nm has 24 shaders</title>
		<description>Discuss Ivy Bridge 22nm has 24 shaders</description>
		<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20677-ivy-bridge-22nm-has-24-shaders</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 10:29:07 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.fudzilla.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_k2/20677/10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>dicobalt says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20677-ivy-bridge-22nm-has-24-shaders#comment-7560</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Integrated graphics have never been good enough for gaming and it never will be good enough for gaming.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>dicobalt</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 01 Nov 2010 21:47:48 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20677-ivy-bridge-22nm-has-24-shaders#comment-7560</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>loadwick says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20677-ivy-bridge-22nm-has-24-shaders#comment-7490</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@deadspeedv Because just as my wife tries to let me, size doesn't matter. In this industry its all about innovation. Any 1 man can come up with a truly ground breaking idea and then it just takes a well organised company to make it happen. AMD have shown this with the fantastic Athlon 64 chips then urinated all over Intel's Pentiums at the time and also their Opteron chips ruled the serve market for quite some time. nVidia is (was) much bigger than ATi but that didn't stop ATi winning many rounds with their bigger, richer ravels. At the moment AMD are holding their own with great price to performance chips but we just want to see them compete with Intel slightly higher up the market.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>loadwick</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 30 Oct 2010 16:30:09 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20677-ivy-bridge-22nm-has-24-shaders#comment-7490</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>deadspeedv says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20677-ivy-bridge-22nm-has-24-shaders#comment-7486</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I dont get this whole AMD Vs Intel thing. Intel is almost 6 times larger then AMD (that includes ATi as well). Hence why AMD struggles to keep up with Intel and can only offer affordability while Intel offers greater performance and considering the size difference between the 2 companies I dont see that performance gap being closed anytime soon.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>deadspeedv</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 30 Oct 2010 15:39:00 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20677-ivy-bridge-22nm-has-24-shaders#comment-7486</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Bl0bb3r says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20677-ivy-bridge-22nm-has-24-shaders#comment-7447</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@nele the thing is, with such chips I would not even bother to mention gaming.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Bl0bb3r</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2010 17:46:47 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20677-ivy-bridge-22nm-has-24-shaders#comment-7447</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>loadwick says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20677-ivy-bridge-22nm-has-24-shaders#comment-7439</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@thomasg My bad, you are right. I meant 45nm. I have been looking at GPU too long! I know what you mean about Half-Node chips but the thing is it costs alot to change everything and you are running the risk of having problems. If intel stick to their current roadmap things are moving along pretty fast, i just hope AMD can catch up soon.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>loadwick</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2010 16:35:55 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20677-ivy-bridge-22nm-has-24-shaders#comment-7439</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>thomasg says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20677-ivy-bridge-22nm-has-24-shaders#comment-7437</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Intel doesn't make any 40nm chips, they went from 45 to 32, then to 22. They don't do half-steps (like 40, 28nm) like some other fabs, such as TSMC. Personally, I like half-steps though, waiting 2 years for a die shrink sucks, like we are now since the other major fabs skipped 32nm.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>thomasg</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2010 16:29:15 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20677-ivy-bridge-22nm-has-24-shaders#comment-7437</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Nerdmaster says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20677-ivy-bridge-22nm-has-24-shaders#comment-7420</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Look who is talking the greatest troll on fudzilla. :lol: :D]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Nerdmaster</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2010 14:56:54 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20677-ivy-bridge-22nm-has-24-shaders#comment-7420</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>yourma2000 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20677-ivy-bridge-22nm-has-24-shaders#comment-7409</link>
			<description><![CDATA[What everyone needs to know is that intel said last year the majority of the gaming market takes place on casual gaming (online flash games, facebook games etc) and said that's where they remain focused hence all of these shitty graphics chips they keep throwing up. Intel aren't a threat to the likes of AMD or Nvidia in the graphics sector, they've no intention of taking on the worlds top 2 graphics manufacturers in the enthusiast gaming market because they know they'll get their arses kicked.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>yourma2000</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2010 13:54:06 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20677-ivy-bridge-22nm-has-24-shaders#comment-7409</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>techno says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20677-ivy-bridge-22nm-has-24-shaders#comment-7405</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@loadwick Agreed both AMD and Nvidia need to develop something for turning off the discrete gpu. Nvidia's Optimus was a good idea but only worked on some notebooks. With hybrid cpu/gpus coming from both AMD and Intel an optimus like system for desktop systems for all AMD/Nvidia/Intel combinations would be a great idea.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>techno</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2010 13:25:54 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20677-ivy-bridge-22nm-has-24-shaders#comment-7405</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>loadwick says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20677-ivy-bridge-22nm-has-24-shaders#comment-7382</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@noypogs16 Fuad does get a little carried away but i think he has a point. Intel's 40nm is hitting 4GHz easily, its 32nm is hitting 5GHz on air, 22nm is supposedly just around the corner and presumably will be another nice jump in clocks but AMD is stuck at 40nm with a poorer overclocker and a very old architecture. Don't get me wrong i love AMD, i have an AMD CPU and graphics card but they need to push out Bulldozer fast and get back in the game!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>loadwick</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2010 11:53:35 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20677-ivy-bridge-22nm-has-24-shaders#comment-7382</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
