<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Nvidia chips power fastest supercomputer</title>
		<description>Discuss Nvidia chips power fastest supercomputer</description>
		<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20661-nvidia-chips-power-fastest-supercomputer</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 05:37:18 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.fudzilla.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_k2/20661/10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>JWellington says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20661-nvidia-chips-power-fastest-supercomputer#comment-7520</link>
			<description><![CDATA["Green Goblin" lmfao, ohhhhh.....you are funny Nick Farrell....]]></description>
			<dc:creator>JWellington</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 01 Nov 2010 12:02:56 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20661-nvidia-chips-power-fastest-supercomputer#comment-7520</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Naterm says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20661-nvidia-chips-power-fastest-supercomputer#comment-7477</link>
			<description><![CDATA[It's worth noting that the performance of GPU supers can fluctuate pretty wildly and sustained performance is quite a bit off from their theoretical maximum. These are very early days for this type of stuff. The Rmax for Jaguar is 1.759 PFLOPS with an Rpeak of 2.331 PFLOPS. The Rmax for Nebulae is 1.271 PFLOPS with and Rpeak of 2.984 PFLOPS. In the end, the shear power consumption advantages of GPUs are going to win out. I'm sure national pride will push the US a little further than they were planning originally. Oak Ridge is building a massive system with nVidia GPUs (10 petaFLOPS) and there is also the 10 PFLOPS Blue Waters system underconstructi on in Illinois. That one uses POWER7 CPUs and no GPUs, however.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Naterm</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 30 Oct 2010 05:24:49 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20661-nvidia-chips-power-fastest-supercomputer#comment-7477</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Naterm says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20661-nvidia-chips-power-fastest-supercomputer#comment-7476</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Hey Warrior, you're exactly right. Don't expect the legion of erroneously informed or just plain ignorant fanboys to accept it. You're wrong about nVidia and PC games though. While they don't officially make them, they provide developers with loads of technical support and hardware. This is something AMD would be well served to copy if they intend to focus primarily on PC gaming. I'm not sure why the Chinese used the 4870X2. Those GPUs are not at all well suited for computation. I'm guessing that machine was more of a test run. There is the off chance that an important piece of their code ran better on AMD's architecture, but it seems rather unlikely considering they stuffed nVidia's HPC cards into the new machine.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Naterm</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 30 Oct 2010 05:15:59 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20661-nvidia-chips-power-fastest-supercomputer#comment-7476</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Nerdmaster says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20661-nvidia-chips-power-fastest-supercomputer#comment-7337</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Another troll :-? What are we going to do they are taking over fudzilla!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Nerdmaster</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2010 08:36:14 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20661-nvidia-chips-power-fastest-supercomputer#comment-7337</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Nerdmaster says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20661-nvidia-chips-power-fastest-supercomputer#comment-7336</link>
			<description><![CDATA[So its Tr0y the troll again... For your information Nvidia is more focused to parallel computing than amd.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Nerdmaster</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2010 08:35:18 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20661-nvidia-chips-power-fastest-supercomputer#comment-7336</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Zaozo says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20661-nvidia-chips-power-fastest-supercomputer#comment-7331</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Um... yeah they do... http://sites.amd.com/us/game/games/Pages/games.aspx AMD has Civ 5, Battlefield Bad Company 2, Medal of Honor, City of Heroes: Going Rouge (which CoH was originally Nvidia, and one of the first games to support PhysX, looks like somebody dropped the ball...) and a ton of others. Do your research before spewing out random crap.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Zaozo</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2010 00:12:33 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20661-nvidia-chips-power-fastest-supercomputer#comment-7331</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>yasin says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20661-nvidia-chips-power-fastest-supercomputer#comment-7327</link>
			<description><![CDATA[nuclear reactor-powered gpu = good for supercomputer nuclear reactor-powered gpu = bad for home.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>yasin</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2010 23:26:33 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20661-nvidia-chips-power-fastest-supercomputer#comment-7327</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Warrior24_7 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20661-nvidia-chips-power-fastest-supercomputer#comment-7318</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Who said that Nvidia didn't support game developers?!! Tech support and game developement are 2 different things. So I guess we'll see who's the dumbass. Name the game that Nvidia developed! Excatly, dumb@$$ :lol: I'm sure that there is much frustration in the dev community because of ATI. Their $h!t sucks.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Warrior24_7</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2010 19:28:19 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20661-nvidia-chips-power-fastest-supercomputer#comment-7318</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>nECrO says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20661-nvidia-chips-power-fastest-supercomputer#comment-7316</link>
			<description><![CDATA[LMAO. A troll schooling a troll. Really Tr0y, your troll act is getting old. Nvidia's "The way it's meant to be played" program and the "support" you just about cream over is nothing more than a thinly veiled bribe system. As AMD's GPU's have matured and gotten better, so has developer support grown. Your jumping on every opportunity to fly your fanboy/troll flag is getting old. But please do supply us with a list of developers who complain. Don't just make wild statements. Prove them or STFU.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>nECrO</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2010 19:22:45 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20661-nvidia-chips-power-fastest-supercomputer#comment-7316</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Tr0y says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20661-nvidia-chips-power-fastest-supercomputer#comment-7315</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Why do dumbass dumbasses think they don't? NVIDIA massively supports game developers - ATI/AMD doesn't. You have no idea how much swearing there's going on in developer studios because of shitty ATI SDKs ;-)]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Tr0y</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2010 19:09:02 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20661-nvidia-chips-power-fastest-supercomputer#comment-7315</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
