<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Geforce „475“ is GF114 based</title>
		<description>Discuss Geforce „475“ is GF114 based</description>
		<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20588-geforce-„475“-is-gf114-based</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 06:15:41 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.fudzilla.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_k2/20588/10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>mack-attack says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20588-geforce-„475“-is-gf114-based#comment-6914</link>
			<description><![CDATA[people freaking out about the amd 6000 naming change should be even more pissed off at nvidias 500 naming change......]]></description>
			<dc:creator>mack-attack</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 24 Oct 2010 16:53:45 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20588-geforce-„475“-is-gf114-based#comment-6914</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Systemlord says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20588-geforce-„475“-is-gf114-based#comment-6855</link>
			<description><![CDATA[You seem to know everything, so what is the CUDA core count if it's not 512? Children not need for name calling, aren't we all mature enough here? Geez]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Systemlord</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2010 21:25:21 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20588-geforce-„475“-is-gf114-based#comment-6855</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Squall_Leonhart says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20588-geforce-„475“-is-gf114-based#comment-6839</link>
			<description><![CDATA[no it isn't fool, it isn't 512, nor is it a GF100 refresh]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Squall_Leonhart</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2010 19:17:52 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20588-geforce-„475“-is-gf114-based#comment-6839</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>genta3d says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20588-geforce-„475“-is-gf114-based#comment-6825</link>
			<description><![CDATA[So it will be the second change branding campaign ? 4xx will be throw as 5xx. Like the other time...]]></description>
			<dc:creator>genta3d</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2010 17:33:34 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20588-geforce-„475“-is-gf114-based#comment-6825</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>ogreslayer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20588-geforce-„475“-is-gf114-based#comment-6809</link>
			<description><![CDATA[IMO this was a bad launch plan by AMD. You know why Nvidia isn't releasing a GTX560 right now? Because AMD was stupid enough to release a card slower than a GTX470. Hell its slower than a vast majority of GTX460 OC models. AMD just let Nvidia steal their launch thunder completely with a $260 price point on the GTX470 which some sites have moved down into the 6870s range or lower with rebates. Now they get to move products that were sitting; generating revenue they weren't getting at all.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>ogreslayer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2010 15:29:06 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20588-geforce-„475“-is-gf114-based#comment-6809</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>leftiszi says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20588-geforce-„475“-is-gf114-based#comment-6804</link>
			<description><![CDATA[GTX 560? Wtf? The way Nvidia and AMD are advancing series naming, they will run out of numbers.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>leftiszi</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2010 14:27:20 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20588-geforce-„475“-is-gf114-based#comment-6804</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Nerdmaster says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20588-geforce-„475“-is-gf114-based#comment-6801</link>
			<description><![CDATA[How naive! If the chips were already ready nvidia would have launched them the same time with 6870.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Nerdmaster</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2010 14:15:13 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20588-geforce-„475“-is-gf114-based#comment-6801</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Tr0y says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20588-geforce-„475“-is-gf114-based#comment-6795</link>
			<description><![CDATA[So true! Nvidia should just take the silicon wasted on all those 465, 470 and 480 rubbish - melt it, and make lots of 580 :D]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Tr0y</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2010 14:10:11 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20588-geforce-„475“-is-gf114-based#comment-6795</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Systemlord says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20588-geforce-„475“-is-gf114-based#comment-6786</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I would like to see Fermi go for a die shrink to 28nm, then maybe it will hopefully shine without the heat loads and excessive power draw! Perhaps then Nvidia can produce a monstrous dual GPU card without the heat and power draw issues! This GTX 580 is what Fermi was meant to be, 512 CUDA, 16SM!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Systemlord</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2010 13:41:01 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20588-geforce-„475“-is-gf114-based#comment-6786</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Tr0y says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20588-geforce-„475“-is-gf114-based#comment-6738</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Nvidia HAS to bring this new card as soon as possible! 475 doesn't sell. Zero. Nada. Nothing. Quite understandable because it really IS high priced AND crappy. 470 and 480 account for maybe 0,5% of all graphic card sales. 460 - surprisingly! - sells not too good either. Surprisingly, because it really is a good card for the money.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Tr0y</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2010 10:30:27 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20588-geforce-„475“-is-gf114-based#comment-6738</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
