<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Radeon HD 6850 has 960 SPs </title>
		<description>Discuss Radeon HD 6850 has 960 SPs </description>
		<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20549-radeon-hd-6850-has-960-sps</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 21:29:17 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.fudzilla.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_k2/20549/10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>Spicard says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20549-radeon-hd-6850-has-960-sps#comment-6545</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Shaders, power draw, and FLOPS would put this in between the 5770 and the 5830. However, If I recall correctly, some rumors and leaked benches were showing it to be comparable or slightly above a 5830. This would make the 6850 a more remarkable card than the 6870, being that the 6870 is too similar to a 5850 to be impressive. Now, this may be due to the 5830 being a bad move with too many things being disabled, but.. that doesn't mean the 6850 doesn't have a nice market ready for it. Pricing being at most 200 dollars would make it a very good deal.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Spicard</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2010 21:14:49 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20549-radeon-hd-6850-has-960-sps#comment-6545</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>nele says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20549-radeon-hd-6850-has-960-sps#comment-6531</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Nah, just think of him as a punching bag...]]></description>
			<dc:creator>nele</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2010 18:08:17 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20549-radeon-hd-6850-has-960-sps#comment-6531</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>agent_47 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20549-radeon-hd-6850-has-960-sps#comment-6524</link>
			<description><![CDATA[cool....i meant 6850. my mistake]]></description>
			<dc:creator>agent_47</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2010 17:07:06 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20549-radeon-hd-6850-has-960-sps#comment-6524</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>das16 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20549-radeon-hd-6850-has-960-sps#comment-6520</link>
			<description><![CDATA[im sorry but the 5850 is way more than 5% faster than the gtx 460]]></description>
			<dc:creator>das16</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2010 16:44:03 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20549-radeon-hd-6850-has-960-sps#comment-6520</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>das16 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20549-radeon-hd-6850-has-960-sps#comment-6519</link>
			<description><![CDATA[lool i see troys still up to his same old antics :D]]></description>
			<dc:creator>das16</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2010 16:35:36 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20549-radeon-hd-6850-has-960-sps#comment-6519</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Maki says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20549-radeon-hd-6850-has-960-sps#comment-6495</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Forever would be better.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Maki</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2010 13:29:10 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20549-radeon-hd-6850-has-960-sps#comment-6495</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>spede says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20549-radeon-hd-6850-has-960-sps#comment-6491</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Nvidia's answer to HD6800 is Troy. :P]]></description>
			<dc:creator>spede</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2010 12:59:20 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20549-radeon-hd-6850-has-960-sps#comment-6491</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Nerdmaster says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20549-radeon-hd-6850-has-960-sps#comment-6487</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Please fudo ban this guy at least for a week! What a moron...]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Nerdmaster</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2010 12:45:56 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20549-radeon-hd-6850-has-960-sps#comment-6487</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Tr0y says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20549-radeon-hd-6850-has-960-sps#comment-6486</link>
			<description><![CDATA[No place beats Santa Clara/California :D]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Tr0y</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2010 12:41:54 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20549-radeon-hd-6850-has-960-sps#comment-6486</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>agent_47 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20549-radeon-hd-6850-has-960-sps#comment-6485</link>
			<description><![CDATA[*sigh* a. no official benchies are out. b. review states 6850 is slightly faster than 460 768MB. lets say 5%? so, 6850 being 5% faster than 460 consumes 23% less power c. lets just assume 460 768MB is faster, u really think it 23% faster?? if you come out and yes then u definitely are a troll....otherwise u just want attention cheers :)]]></description>
			<dc:creator>agent_47</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2010 12:04:27 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20549-radeon-hd-6850-has-960-sps#comment-6485</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
