<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Radeon HD 6870 has 151W TDP</title>
		<description>Discuss Radeon HD 6870 has 151W TDP</description>
		<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20547-radeon-hd-6870-has-151w-tdp</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 14:57:51 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.fudzilla.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_k2/20547/10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>Boomstick777 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20547-radeon-hd-6870-has-151w-tdp#comment-6682</link>
			<description><![CDATA[lol :D]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Boomstick777</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2010 20:30:46 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20547-radeon-hd-6870-has-151w-tdp#comment-6682</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Spicard says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20547-radeon-hd-6870-has-151w-tdp#comment-6543</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Performance/watt is nearly identical as far as we know.. Launch day proper benchmarks may change this. This is partially due to still being on 40nm. Now, todays news also adds that on top of price/performance advantage, it also has a die-size/transistor to performance advantage. If you were to buy right now, the 6870 will be the alternative to the 5850, the 5870 still being in the lead. If you wanted the best, you would want to go for either a 5970 or the upcoming 69xx. The naming scheme is indeed odd, huh?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Spicard</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2010 21:10:16 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20547-radeon-hd-6870-has-151w-tdp#comment-6543</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>LuxZg says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20547-radeon-hd-6870-has-151w-tdp#comment-6474</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Not interested in reading all comments.. But this card is interesting to me. I've got HD4890 which has ~40W higher TDP, and is DX 10.1. On the other hand, this card should perform somewhere between HD5850 & HD5870, which have TDP between 151W & 188W. So in total, it wins in price/performance and performance/watt against any of these cards. Only thing where it su**s is the naming scheme. But it's just a name, and it can be called C.R.A.P. and it would still be an interesting card to buy..]]></description>
			<dc:creator>LuxZg</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2010 11:14:31 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20547-radeon-hd-6870-has-151w-tdp#comment-6474</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>hellfire says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20547-radeon-hd-6870-has-151w-tdp#comment-6460</link>
			<description><![CDATA[think of it as of a new 4800 in terms of chip size, price and consumption. the only difference that there will be also faster singlechip (6900 series).]]></description>
			<dc:creator>hellfire</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2010 06:59:51 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20547-radeon-hd-6870-has-151w-tdp#comment-6460</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Spicard says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20547-radeon-hd-6870-has-151w-tdp#comment-6458</link>
			<description><![CDATA[It has more shaders than a 5770, less than a 5850, uses more power than a 5770, identical to a 5850. I would not call it a refreshed 5770. If it costs over 200, it will be priced above a 5770. Under 250, it will be priced below a 5850. Similarly, as far as rumors and leaks go, it performs close to a 5850. Hate to be the bearer of bad news, but it's not so much an improvement as it is an alternative. Similar price, similar performance, similar power draw. Nothing to write home about. 69xx maybe]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Spicard</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2010 06:06:29 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20547-radeon-hd-6870-has-151w-tdp#comment-6458</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>nt300 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20547-radeon-hd-6870-has-151w-tdp#comment-6452</link>
			<description><![CDATA[This is a good example of the name change causing confusion. Hope AMD makes people aware of the name change so people won't think the HD 6870 is faster than the HD 5870.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>nt300</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2010 02:54:19 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20547-radeon-hd-6870-has-151w-tdp#comment-6452</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Bl0bb3r says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20547-radeon-hd-6870-has-151w-tdp#comment-6447</link>
			<description><![CDATA[+1 Keyword: cheaper... that's what most people are screaming for. Competition yielding lower prices, well this time it's in the form of a new product with lowered price instead of a price cut of an old product.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Bl0bb3r</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2010 01:00:11 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20547-radeon-hd-6870-has-151w-tdp#comment-6447</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Bl0bb3r says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20547-radeon-hd-6870-has-151w-tdp#comment-6445</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Actually, the card takes 75W from the PCIe bus, so through those PCIe power cables goes the rest if not more when needed, although less than 151W for sure. Since the PCIe specs are not open no one can state (for free) how much a 6 pin can deliver. Some say 75W for 3+N (6 pins) connectors, that's 25W per wire, but the 4+N connectors (8 pins) can do 150W, that's 37W+ per wire. Basically, a single 6 pin PEG + the bus power would have been sufficient. But I agree, it's better to split for the sake of the cheapo PSU, not the graphics card. @Fuad, TDP of a card ?!?!... that's a rating for chips only, for how much heat they can output! 151W power consumption maybe.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Bl0bb3r</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2010 00:36:34 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20547-radeon-hd-6870-has-151w-tdp#comment-6445</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>MrScary says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20547-radeon-hd-6870-has-151w-tdp#comment-6427</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Troy the Troll, hahaha]]></description>
			<dc:creator>MrScary</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2010 20:26:55 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20547-radeon-hd-6870-has-151w-tdp#comment-6427</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>jonelsorel says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20547-radeon-hd-6870-has-151w-tdp#comment-6418</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Would you really like 150+1 watts going through 1 connector ? I'd rather have them split into 2 for durability.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>jonelsorel</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2010 19:16:14 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20547-radeon-hd-6870-has-151w-tdp#comment-6418</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
