<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Cayman XT and PRO are Radeon HD 6970 and HD 6950</title>
		<description>Discuss Cayman XT and PRO are Radeon HD 6970 and HD 6950</description>
		<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20545-cayman-xt-and-pro-are-radeon-hd-6970-and-hd-6950</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 16:38:55 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.fudzilla.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_k2/20545/10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>droid_hunter says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20545-cayman-xt-and-pro-are-radeon-hd-6970-and-hd-6950#comment-6551</link>
			<description><![CDATA[whatever happened to 6870 and 6850?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>droid_hunter</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2010 22:52:38 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20545-cayman-xt-and-pro-are-radeon-hd-6970-and-hd-6950#comment-6551</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Jurassic1024 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20545-cayman-xt-and-pro-are-radeon-hd-6970-and-hd-6950#comment-6548</link>
			<description><![CDATA[You (Gregg4422) get rated up, and the guy before you (007vsMaguathe) that you stick up for, for saying the SAME THING, gets rated down. Fudzilla = Where the readers are full of it (Fud that is).]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Jurassic1024</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2010 22:10:05 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20545-cayman-xt-and-pro-are-radeon-hd-6970-and-hd-6950#comment-6548</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Nerdmaster says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20545-cayman-xt-and-pro-are-radeon-hd-6970-and-hd-6950#comment-6506</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Lets be more calm. :-|]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Nerdmaster</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2010 15:05:35 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20545-cayman-xt-and-pro-are-radeon-hd-6970-and-hd-6950#comment-6506</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Scootiep says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20545-cayman-xt-and-pro-are-radeon-hd-6970-and-hd-6950#comment-6505</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Seriously? What "hateful rant" are you talking about? Are you a complete fricking moron? No-where in the article does it say ANYTHING that attacks AMD. He doesn't even MENTION nVidia or Intel or any other competitor. And the SINGLE comment about the chip being AMD's biggest and hottest to date is completely true and verifiable. Not to mention the fact that when he said that he was flat out stating that it should be a BETTER card for performance. You sir are a complete and utter imbecile. Do your perceived intelligence a favor (if you have any left) and stop posting.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Scootiep</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2010 14:49:03 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20545-cayman-xt-and-pro-are-radeon-hd-6970-and-hd-6950#comment-6505</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Scootiep says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20545-cayman-xt-and-pro-are-radeon-hd-6970-and-hd-6950#comment-6504</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Seconded ;-)]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Scootiep</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2010 14:43:53 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20545-cayman-xt-and-pro-are-radeon-hd-6970-and-hd-6950#comment-6504</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Nerdmaster says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20545-cayman-xt-and-pro-are-radeon-hd-6970-and-hd-6950#comment-6492</link>
			<description><![CDATA[:D Retarded. :D]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Nerdmaster</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2010 12:59:53 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20545-cayman-xt-and-pro-are-radeon-hd-6970-and-hd-6950#comment-6492</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Fud_u says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20545-cayman-xt-and-pro-are-radeon-hd-6970-and-hd-6950#comment-6461</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Just in time for the cold season.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Fud_u</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2010 07:08:28 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20545-cayman-xt-and-pro-are-radeon-hd-6970-and-hd-6950#comment-6461</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Sinister213 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20545-cayman-xt-and-pro-are-radeon-hd-6970-and-hd-6950#comment-6459</link>
			<description><![CDATA[REALLY? WHO GIVES A SH!T. I HAVE AN AREA 51 WITH TWO 480'S AND THEY'RE GREAT. SURE THE SETUP WITH TWO 5970'S WOULD HAVE BEEN BETTER IN VANTAGE BUT WHO CARES. THERE ARE NEGATIVES TO BOTH. (NO PHYSX FOR AMD AND TOO MUCH POWER FOR NV) WHO CARES ABOUT POWER IF YOU'RE BUYING BAD@SS CARDS???? I'M NO FANBOY BUT TO ME PHYSX IS A PRETTY BIG DEAL THAT I'M NO LONGER WILLING TO GO WITHOUT. GO GET SOME PU$$Y SO U JAGS CAN QUIT ARGUING OVER WHICH IS BETTER. THERE SHOULD BE A PROOF OF OWNERSHIP REQUIREMENT BEFORE YOU CAN LEAVE A COMMENT BECAUSE IM SURE ALOT OF YOU ARE RUNNING 4350'S. LMAO. SOUNDS LIKE THE 360/PS3 ARGUMENT.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Sinister213</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2010 06:31:37 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20545-cayman-xt-and-pro-are-radeon-hd-6970-and-hd-6950#comment-6459</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>nforce4max says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20545-cayman-xt-and-pro-are-radeon-hd-6970-and-hd-6950#comment-6448</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Hmm knowing how the R600 was their largest and hottest single gpu if what they say is true then brace your selves.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>nforce4max</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2010 01:35:06 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20545-cayman-xt-and-pro-are-radeon-hd-6970-and-hd-6950#comment-6448</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Super XP says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20545-cayman-xt-and-pro-are-radeon-hd-6970-and-hd-6950#comment-6439</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ATI's Radeon's big and hot? LOL, It's already been confirmed the original Fermi has design issues which is why NVIDIA is having problems with it. They need to go back to the drawing board IMO. I may not agree with AMD's name change for the HD 6800/6900 series, but currently they are rocking PC gaming and graphics Hands Down...]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Super XP</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2010 23:12:30 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20545-cayman-xt-and-pro-are-radeon-hd-6970-and-hd-6950#comment-6439</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
