<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Radeon 6870 scores 7500 in 3Dmark Vantage</title>
		<description>Discuss Radeon 6870 scores 7500 in 3Dmark Vantage</description>
		<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20544-radeon-6870-scores-7500-in-3dmark-vantage</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 01:57:35 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.fudzilla.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_k2/20544/10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>redisnidma says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20544-radeon-6870-scores-7500-in-3dmark-vantage#comment-6544</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I don't like to see bias in anything as you state, is just that Fuad has a history of strong Nvidia+intel bias. (Don't attack the user, attack the source!)]]></description>
			<dc:creator>redisnidma</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2010 21:13:10 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20544-radeon-6870-scores-7500-in-3dmark-vantage#comment-6544</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Nerdmaster says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20544-radeon-6870-scores-7500-in-3dmark-vantage#comment-6517</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Watch out Tr0y edited his first post, the original was: Radeon HD 5870 scores 9000 HD 5850 scores 7200 Non overclocked GTX 460 scores 7000 LOL. So my overclocked GTX460 (715MHz -> 950MHz) still beats a 6870 easily. Even a 5870 ... Lets see if I get -100 for this posting ... lol ... by the way: ATI fanboys suck :) (So don't thumb him up! ;-) )]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Nerdmaster</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2010 16:15:30 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20544-radeon-6870-scores-7500-in-3dmark-vantage#comment-6517</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Nerdmaster says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20544-radeon-6870-scores-7500-in-3dmark-vantage#comment-6490</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Hear that Tr0y? You also changed your comment in order to get more thumbs up. However when people see (-170) they wont thumb you up.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Nerdmaster</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2010 12:56:55 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20544-radeon-6870-scores-7500-in-3dmark-vantage#comment-6490</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>nele says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20544-radeon-6870-scores-7500-in-3dmark-vantage#comment-6469</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Uhm, I think you're missing the point - enthusiasts who go for Thubans will also get something better than a 6850/6870... But I guess you just like to see bias in anything...]]></description>
			<dc:creator>nele</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2010 10:57:14 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20544-radeon-6870-scores-7500-in-3dmark-vantage#comment-6469</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>nele says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20544-radeon-6870-scores-7500-in-3dmark-vantage#comment-6468</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Yes you can. :-* and you can also get banned for posting crap like this - consider this your first and last warning.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>nele</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2010 10:53:55 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20544-radeon-6870-scores-7500-in-3dmark-vantage#comment-6468</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>spede says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20544-radeon-6870-scores-7500-in-3dmark-vantage#comment-6462</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Fuad/Troy will be really upset when opens this link: 8) http://vr-zone.com/articles/amd-radeon-hd-6800-dirt-2-battleforge-benchmarks-leaked/10091.html]]></description>
			<dc:creator>spede</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2010 07:09:47 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20544-radeon-6870-scores-7500-in-3dmark-vantage#comment-6462</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>redisnidma says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20544-radeon-6870-scores-7500-in-3dmark-vantage#comment-6456</link>
			<description><![CDATA[LOL. That wasn't nice. :D Seriously dude, do your research before posting such nonsense. Why in the world would you buy a gargantuan GPU to run it at 1024x768? At higher resolutions ( >=2560x1600 ) Thuban performs better than an intel's hex-cores, and if you don't believe me, I will gather the evidence for you so that I can embarrass you publicly in this site. ;-)]]></description>
			<dc:creator>redisnidma</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2010 04:45:16 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20544-radeon-6870-scores-7500-in-3dmark-vantage#comment-6456</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Bl0bb3r says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20544-radeon-6870-scores-7500-in-3dmark-vantage#comment-6449</link>
			<description><![CDATA[And what exactly do you have against his computer?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Bl0bb3r</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2010 01:42:46 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20544-radeon-6870-scores-7500-in-3dmark-vantage#comment-6449</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Jurassic1024 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20544-radeon-6870-scores-7500-in-3dmark-vantage#comment-6441</link>
			<description><![CDATA[You just made Troy look smarter than God. At higher resolutions you think the CPU (any) plays the biggest role?! ~90% of the time, at higher resolutions, you become GPU-bound, not CPU!!! Wow you are truly stupid. It's funny, cuz reviewers use the LOWER resolutions (800x600, 1024x768, 1280x1024) in games to test the effect of the CPU for a REASON. Obviously you've never reviewed a CPU before. kill yourself and your computer.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Jurassic1024</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2010 23:30:04 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20544-radeon-6870-scores-7500-in-3dmark-vantage#comment-6441</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>redisnidma says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20544-radeon-6870-scores-7500-in-3dmark-vantage#comment-6409</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Another hateful and unprofessional slang from Fuad. :-? Did you know that at higher resolutions, Thubans perform alot better than any of intel's hex-cores?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>redisnidma</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2010 18:18:21 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20544-radeon-6870-scores-7500-in-3dmark-vantage#comment-6409</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
