<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>AMD confirms HD 6800 launch date</title>
		<description>Discuss AMD confirms HD 6800 launch date</description>
		<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20540-amd-confirms-hd-6800-launch-date</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 20:14:12 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.fudzilla.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_k2/20540/10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>arclight says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20540-amd-confirms-hd-6800-launch-date#comment-6424</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Good to hear, it's so close i can feel it in the air, i can feel it in the water....wait wait wasn't that in the LOTR opening? Excuse me, I guess i got side tracked.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>arclight</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2010 19:58:39 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20540-amd-confirms-hd-6800-launch-date#comment-6424</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>thomasg says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20540-amd-confirms-hd-6800-launch-date#comment-6423</link>
			<description><![CDATA["basically it has just confirmed what we've been saying for weeks" Weren't you saying the 12th until about the 11th? :P]]></description>
			<dc:creator>thomasg</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2010 19:47:25 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20540-amd-confirms-hd-6800-launch-date#comment-6423</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Bl0bb3r says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20540-amd-confirms-hd-6800-launch-date#comment-6363</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Does the 6850 have those outputs or is it a photoshopped 6870? Hm... Edit: apparently it does. More at TPU. Also here are the reasons why Barts is 6800: - Radeon HD 6800 series is too fast to sell at the price points HD 5700 series sells, so it warrants a slightly higher price point. - Selling at those price-points won't go well with the 6700 series brand-identifier, hence HD 6800 series. Instead HD 6800 will fall in the same league which both GPU vendors refer to as the "gamer's sweet-spot", which figuratively is a price range between $199~$249. - AMD wants to consolidate all high-end SKUs into the Radeon HD 6900 series, it's wasteful letting a low-volume, ultra-high end, dual-GPU SKU occupy the whole of it.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Bl0bb3r</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2010 15:53:58 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20540-amd-confirms-hd-6800-launch-date#comment-6363</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>thematrix606 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20540-amd-confirms-hd-6800-launch-date#comment-6345</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I know. But you would not get that from the articles you read on here.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>thematrix606</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2010 15:07:58 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20540-amd-confirms-hd-6800-launch-date#comment-6345</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>nele says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20540-amd-confirms-hd-6800-launch-date#comment-6330</link>
			<description><![CDATA[The 6800 is not a Cypress replacement, hence I don't see what you're getting at. It will end up some 30 percent faster than the 5700 series, which it's replacing.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>nele</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2010 13:23:09 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20540-amd-confirms-hd-6800-launch-date#comment-6330</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>thematrix606 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20540-amd-confirms-hd-6800-launch-date#comment-6328</link>
			<description><![CDATA[From http://www.fudzilla.com/graphics/item/20465-rumoured-hd-6800-performance-leaks-out : "the upcoming HD 6800 series ends up marginally slower than the HD 5800 series" Yet now you say: "the HD 6800 series already looks like a winner." A slower winner? Make up your mind... you might want to COMMUNICATE INTERNALLY. Kthnxbye.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>thematrix606</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2010 12:49:15 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20540-amd-confirms-hd-6800-launch-date#comment-6328</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Wolfesteinabhi says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20540-amd-confirms-hd-6800-launch-date#comment-6327</link>
			<description><![CDATA[from whatever has been already written about Caymen..i would say YES ..its around 300W]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Wolfesteinabhi</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2010 12:27:12 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20540-amd-confirms-hd-6800-launch-date#comment-6327</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>JWellington says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20540-amd-confirms-hd-6800-launch-date#comment-6325</link>
			<description><![CDATA[AMD/ATI sure has increased the attractiveness of their graphic cards over the last few generations, starting with the 4000 series. OT: Will the Cayman XT card be double the power of Barts XT, the same way that Cypress was to Juniper?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>JWellington</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2010 12:18:20 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20540-amd-confirms-hd-6800-launch-date#comment-6325</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
