<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Radeon HD 6870 has 1120 shaders</title>
		<description>Discuss Radeon HD 6870 has 1120 shaders</description>
		<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20525-radeon-hd-6870-has-1120-shaders</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 12:52:30 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.fudzilla.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_k2/20525/10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>BorgOvermind says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20525-radeon-hd-6870-has-1120-shaders#comment-6320</link>
			<description><![CDATA[In the XYZ0 naming system, the Y actually represents the die size, not the market position (mid, high, etc). That's why the 6800 /barts series will be named so and the top ones will be 6900.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>BorgOvermind</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2010 11:28:34 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20525-radeon-hd-6870-has-1120-shaders#comment-6320</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>eugen says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20525-radeon-hd-6870-has-1120-shaders#comment-6307</link>
			<description><![CDATA[i adore these type of comments:)]]></description>
			<dc:creator>eugen</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2010 08:10:12 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20525-radeon-hd-6870-has-1120-shaders#comment-6307</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Fud_u says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20525-radeon-hd-6870-has-1120-shaders#comment-6306</link>
			<description><![CDATA[At least they drop the GT, Pro, XT, and XTX branding. But the hd6870 is less powerful than 5870 had me thinking again. :o]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Fud_u</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2010 05:09:40 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20525-radeon-hd-6870-has-1120-shaders#comment-6306</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Super XP says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20525-radeon-hd-6870-has-1120-shaders#comment-6297</link>
			<description><![CDATA[It's because people will not know it's a midrange card due to it being named under the HD 6800 series. Just like the HD 3800's, 4800's & the 5800's which were all high end models.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Super XP</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 18 Oct 2010 21:08:41 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20525-radeon-hd-6870-has-1120-shaders#comment-6297</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>hellfire says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20525-radeon-hd-6870-has-1120-shaders#comment-6294</link>
			<description><![CDATA[indeed, still there are lots of rumors about new 4D design..]]></description>
			<dc:creator>hellfire</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 18 Oct 2010 19:22:07 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20525-radeon-hd-6870-has-1120-shaders#comment-6294</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>gangsta072 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20525-radeon-hd-6870-has-1120-shaders#comment-6293</link>
			<description><![CDATA[amd's design had alway 5 units per block if that is what you mean .]]></description>
			<dc:creator>gangsta072</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 18 Oct 2010 19:14:07 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20525-radeon-hd-6870-has-1120-shaders#comment-6293</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>nECrO says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20525-radeon-hd-6870-has-1120-shaders#comment-6292</link>
			<description><![CDATA[You forgot to mention that girls with battle armor AND cleavage outsell everything!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>nECrO</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 18 Oct 2010 17:46:43 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20525-radeon-hd-6870-has-1120-shaders#comment-6292</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Haberlandt says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20525-radeon-hd-6870-has-1120-shaders#comment-6287</link>
			<description><![CDATA[1 Comment = A shitload of comments.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Haberlandt</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 18 Oct 2010 17:22:48 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20525-radeon-hd-6870-has-1120-shaders#comment-6287</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>canerpense says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20525-radeon-hd-6870-has-1120-shaders#comment-6284</link>
			<description><![CDATA[5770 is the predecessor of 6870. Not 5870. Also its only %5 faster than 5850 and no where near 5870. AMD stupidly changed the name scheme (now everybody thinks that "6870 is the new 5870", what a loser's way to get more sells...), so get over it.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>canerpense</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 18 Oct 2010 16:24:29 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20525-radeon-hd-6870-has-1120-shaders#comment-6284</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>pogsnet says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20525-radeon-hd-6870-has-1120-shaders#comment-6281</link>
			<description><![CDATA[These are just rumors, all I know AMD wont release product for next gen slightly slower or slower from its predecessor, it is just stupid like FUAD.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>pogsnet</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 18 Oct 2010 15:47:12 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20525-radeon-hd-6870-has-1120-shaders#comment-6281</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
