<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title> Juniper 5700 might get rebranded</title>
		<description>Discuss  Juniper 5700 might get rebranded</description>
		<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20500-juniper-5700-might-get-rebranded</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 07:37:57 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.fudzilla.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_k2/20500/10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>Nerdmaster says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20500-juniper-5700-might-get-rebranded#comment-6134</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Fudzilla will be very happy then or not? (they will have more reasons to accuse amd).]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Nerdmaster</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 15 Oct 2010 16:09:21 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20500-juniper-5700-might-get-rebranded#comment-6134</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Bl0bb3r says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20500-juniper-5700-might-get-rebranded#comment-6037</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Was thinking the same thing when I saw the slide in the previous article... it's just an arrow that points out Juniper will live longer than Cypress. Nothing more. besides, wouldn't it be stupid to later come out with a new chip but have its model name already taken by an older part? Also what amazes me, no model numbers, just core names. Strange.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Bl0bb3r</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 14 Oct 2010 22:57:32 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20500-juniper-5700-might-get-rebranded#comment-6037</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>spigzone says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20500-juniper-5700-might-get-rebranded#comment-6034</link>
			<description><![CDATA[No matter how you slice it and dice it, Nvidia is in big trouble.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>spigzone</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 14 Oct 2010 22:46:17 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20500-juniper-5700-might-get-rebranded#comment-6034</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>yourma2000 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20500-juniper-5700-might-get-rebranded#comment-6029</link>
			<description><![CDATA[If the 6970 is going to pull just under 300w of power then I'm scared to think what a 6970x2 is going to require, I seriously hope that the heat isn't a big issue]]></description>
			<dc:creator>yourma2000</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 14 Oct 2010 22:23:09 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20500-juniper-5700-might-get-rebranded#comment-6029</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>thomasg says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20500-juniper-5700-might-get-rebranded#comment-6020</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I think the slides are just stating that Juniper will not be replaced between no and December, it doesn't say anything about rebranding it.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>thomasg</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 14 Oct 2010 20:11:49 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20500-juniper-5700-might-get-rebranded#comment-6020</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>spede says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20500-juniper-5700-might-get-rebranded#comment-6017</link>
			<description><![CDATA["rebranding or whatever do you want to call it, is something that AMD plans to do with its HD 5700 Juniper based cards." "AMD still isn't officially talking about branding, so take this info with a grain of salt, as these things can easily change" First you say they are rebranding and next paragraph you say its all bs speculation. Nice.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>spede</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 14 Oct 2010 19:17:46 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20500-juniper-5700-might-get-rebranded#comment-6017</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Alereon says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20500-juniper-5700-might-get-rebranded#comment-6015</link>
			<description><![CDATA[As much as this would suck from an innovation standpoint, it makes sense as the GTS 450 is barely competitive now, and nVidia's options for adding cards to its lineup are mostly limited to a GTX 475 (based on an uncut GF104) and a GTX 495 (a potential dual-GF104 card).]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Alereon</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 14 Oct 2010 19:03:36 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20500-juniper-5700-might-get-rebranded#comment-6015</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>noypogs16 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20500-juniper-5700-might-get-rebranded#comment-5984</link>
			<description><![CDATA[my goodness antilles is a super monster chip cant wait to see the performance]]></description>
			<dc:creator>noypogs16</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 14 Oct 2010 16:55:40 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20500-juniper-5700-might-get-rebranded#comment-5984</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Haberlandt says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20500-juniper-5700-might-get-rebranded#comment-5982</link>
			<description><![CDATA[What about Redwood, Cedar and the GT 430? Also, isn't it GTS 450 instead of GTX 450?.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Haberlandt</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 14 Oct 2010 16:54:07 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20500-juniper-5700-might-get-rebranded#comment-5982</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>fudzillalololo says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20500-juniper-5700-might-get-rebranded#comment-5981</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I am just wondering, how do you know it's a rebrand? ATI never said anything about codenames, etc. Everyone just base this on rumors, and rumors Barts is 6700 Barts is 6800 Bla, bla... It would be a rebrand if they actually revealed something before.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>fudzillalololo</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 14 Oct 2010 16:32:30 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20500-juniper-5700-might-get-rebranded#comment-5981</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
