<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Core i5 2500 has four cores and just as many threads</title>
		<description>Discuss Core i5 2500 has four cores and just as many threads</description>
		<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20442-core-i5-2500-has-four-cores-and-just-as-many-threads</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 08:44:54 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.fudzilla.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_k2/20442/10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>loadwick says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20442-core-i5-2500-has-four-cores-and-just-as-many-threads#comment-5667</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Ivy Bridge is meant to be still on track for 2H 2011. This just seems crazy. Intel are not going to release a whole new generation in Sandy Bridge and then replace it within 6 months!?? I guess they might just release a few 22nm parts like they did with 32nm but even that seems so unlikely right now. I mean we won't even have high-end Sand Bridge parts out yet and we will have the replacement for Sand Bridge at our door step!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>loadwick</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2010 00:53:39 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20442-core-i5-2500-has-four-cores-and-just-as-many-threads#comment-5667</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Alereon says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20442-core-i5-2500-has-four-cores-and-just-as-many-threads#comment-5512</link>
			<description><![CDATA[As much as I like competition, this is exceedingly unlikely. Bulldozer-based processors will likely have sweet onboard graphics, but there's basically no chance of them being performance-competitive on the CPU front, except in heavily multithreaded applications.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Alereon</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 10 Oct 2010 12:25:33 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20442-core-i5-2500-has-four-cores-and-just-as-many-threads#comment-5512</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Nerdmaster says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20442-core-i5-2500-has-four-cores-and-just-as-many-threads#comment-5497</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Amd cpus with graphics will beat i5 both in cost and performance.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Nerdmaster</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 09 Oct 2010 17:59:21 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20442-core-i5-2500-has-four-cores-and-just-as-many-threads#comment-5497</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Squuiid says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20442-core-i5-2500-has-four-cores-and-just-as-many-threads#comment-5495</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Speaka Englis? Dude, seriously, this is a poorly written article and barely coherent. It should either be re-written or pulled from the site.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Squuiid</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 09 Oct 2010 13:20:12 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20442-core-i5-2500-has-four-cores-and-just-as-many-threads#comment-5495</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>redisnidma says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20442-core-i5-2500-has-four-cores-and-just-as-many-threads#comment-5472</link>
			<description><![CDATA[OUCH!!! :D]]></description>
			<dc:creator>redisnidma</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2010 22:34:24 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20442-core-i5-2500-has-four-cores-and-just-as-many-threads#comment-5472</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>blandead says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20442-core-i5-2500-has-four-cores-and-just-as-many-threads#comment-5446</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Sorry but I hate you're articles fuad you always say inaccurate things such as "Core i5 Sandy Bridge CPUs and both of them will get stuck only with four cores doing four hyperthreaded operations." they are not hyperthreaded period so they are not "hyperthreaded operations" its a simple 1 thread per core. The i7 with 8 threads is hyperthreaded. You think you'd know that since first i7 920 came out. Unless you are telling us that with Turbo overclocking and 2 cores are shut down the first 2 cores can hyperthread to four threads and it switches over to 4 real cores when it benefits more then it would make sense, but I never heard of such a thing. So which is it? I like the articles everyone else on Fudzilla writes. Just being honest.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>blandead</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2010 14:43:39 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20442-core-i5-2500-has-four-cores-and-just-as-many-threads#comment-5446</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>ogi says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20442-core-i5-2500-has-four-cores-and-just-as-many-threads#comment-5440</link>
			<description><![CDATA[And this is news? This was all covered a couple of weeks ago, all of this info is even in wikipedia for a long time already. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sandy_Bridge_(microarchitecture)#Desktop_proce ssors]]></description>
			<dc:creator>ogi</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2010 12:45:57 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20442-core-i5-2500-has-four-cores-and-just-as-many-threads#comment-5440</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
