<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>MSI intros Twin Frozr GTX 480</title>
		<description>Discuss MSI intros Twin Frozr GTX 480</description>
		<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20353-msi-intros-twin-frozr-gtx-480</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 17:15:14 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.fudzilla.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_k2/20353/10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>Dev says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20353-msi-intros-twin-frozr-gtx-480#comment-4988</link>
			<description><![CDATA[6770 isnt in the market right now so u cant tell how much watt it will consume or performance would be better or worse than 480..but from 5870 consumption wise its clear that it will be on the lower side though . It is a personal taste what will u drive on road or use in your mother board.. if every people on earth think like u then there will be only 2 type of graphics cards on the market..]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Dev</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2010 20:03:00 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20353-msi-intros-twin-frozr-gtx-480#comment-4988</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Nerdmaster says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20353-msi-intros-twin-frozr-gtx-480#comment-4936</link>
			<description><![CDATA[A 700nm chip at Fermi size would have a leakage current of some mA and not 100A. The conclusion is that 28nm and 22nm are gonna probably be even harder to use than 40nm.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Nerdmaster</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2010 07:59:00 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20353-msi-intros-twin-frozr-gtx-480#comment-4936</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Nerdmaster says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20353-msi-intros-twin-frozr-gtx-480#comment-4935</link>
			<description><![CDATA[You have to be a computer engineer to figure out the chip consuption. Also what most people do not know and gets on my nerves is that when we have a die shrink the exact same design draws 7 times more current (almost 7 times more power) because the leakage current increases as transistor size decreases. The engineers then have to redesign the chip to decrease leakage current. A bad design draws way to much power. Thats why Fermi had huge power consumption like 280W (at least the first cards that came out to the market).]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Nerdmaster</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2010 07:56:17 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20353-msi-intros-twin-frozr-gtx-480#comment-4935</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Tr0y says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20353-msi-intros-twin-frozr-gtx-480#comment-4932</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Am I talking to idiots here?!?! It's like I say: "A typical Petrol engine has an efficiency of 35 %" ... and you say: "But mine has 12 cylinders and needs more petrol".]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Tr0y</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2010 06:33:17 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20353-msi-intros-twin-frozr-gtx-480#comment-4932</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>AmdAti says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20353-msi-intros-twin-frozr-gtx-480#comment-4925</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I agree and add that gpu die size also has an effect on heat output.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>AmdAti</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2010 01:26:39 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20353-msi-intros-twin-frozr-gtx-480#comment-4925</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>tekken says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20353-msi-intros-twin-frozr-gtx-480#comment-4924</link>
			<description><![CDATA[You could have simply written how you have absolutely no clue whatsoever about chip architecture and manufacturing, and leave it at that. Much less bandwidth and time wasted honestly.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>tekken</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2010 00:08:07 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20353-msi-intros-twin-frozr-gtx-480#comment-4924</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Tr0y says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20353-msi-intros-twin-frozr-gtx-480#comment-4923</link>
			<description><![CDATA[There are no miracles. With a 40nm design you get about 2.5 GFLOPS / Watt. No matter if it's Intel, ATI/AMD or NVidia. So 6xxx cards may be faster than 5xxx cards - but they will also need more power. A card with the same speed as the GTX480 will need the same power as the GTX480. Maybe +/- 20 watt (because of good/bad design). That's simple math. So if Cayman XT is as fast as a GTX480, it will need 250 watt. Because it's also a 40nm design. I like my 5770 - and I don't see why I should update. It consumes "only" 100 watt - and the performance is awesome. Why would I buy a GTX480 or 6770 that needs 250 watt?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Tr0y</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2010 23:51:44 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20353-msi-intros-twin-frozr-gtx-480#comment-4923</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Jaberwocky says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20353-msi-intros-twin-frozr-gtx-480#comment-4917</link>
			<description><![CDATA[And is probably 25% cooler (I mean that it produces less heat.Not that it looks suitably fasionable:P )]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Jaberwocky</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2010 23:18:32 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20353-msi-intros-twin-frozr-gtx-480#comment-4917</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>nele says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20353-msi-intros-twin-frozr-gtx-480#comment-4916</link>
			<description><![CDATA[You forgot "25% cooler..." Or more]]></description>
			<dc:creator>nele</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2010 23:16:38 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20353-msi-intros-twin-frozr-gtx-480#comment-4916</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>leftiszi says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20353-msi-intros-twin-frozr-gtx-480#comment-4915</link>
			<description><![CDATA[...and then the Cayman XT comes out and is 25% faster and 25% cheaper.!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>leftiszi</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2010 23:04:44 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20353-msi-intros-twin-frozr-gtx-480#comment-4915</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
