<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Sandy Bridge to get USB 3.0 support</title>
		<description>Discuss Sandy Bridge to get USB 3.0 support</description>
		<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20347-sandy-bridge-to-get-usb-30-support</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 18:44:47 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.fudzilla.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_k2/20347/10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>blandead says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20347-sandy-bridge-to-get-usb-30-support#comment-4930</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I thought the NEC one was 'superspeed 3.0' so it's faster]]></description>
			<dc:creator>blandead</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2010 03:57:49 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20347-sandy-bridge-to-get-usb-30-support#comment-4930</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>FuturePastNow says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20347-sandy-bridge-to-get-usb-30-support#comment-4926</link>
			<description><![CDATA[If it's built in, then why do all of the P67 boards shown so far with USB 3.0 use a separate chip (usually the NEC one)? Did Intel hide this even from motherboard makers? That's not good.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>FuturePastNow</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2010 02:24:20 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20347-sandy-bridge-to-get-usb-30-support#comment-4926</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>boobster says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20347-sandy-bridge-to-get-usb-30-support#comment-4901</link>
			<description><![CDATA["We have asked around and it turns out that USB 3.0 native support is there, but Intel didn’t want to talk about it, as apparently the USB 3.0 spec is still not 100 percent closed and Intel is a bit careful." Is still not closed, was not closed or is closed? Because if Intel were waiting for it to be closed, and it is still not, they would still be waiting. Right...?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>boobster</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2010 18:55:29 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20347-sandy-bridge-to-get-usb-30-support#comment-4901</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
