<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Sandy Bridge to score low in 3Dmark 11</title>
		<description>Discuss Sandy Bridge to score low in 3Dmark 11</description>
		<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20345-sandy-bridge-to-score-low-in-3dmark-11</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 21:05:16 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.fudzilla.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_k2/20345/10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>redisnidma says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20345-sandy-bridge-to-score-low-in-3dmark-11#comment-4933</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Sour grapes from Intel. ;-)]]></description>
			<dc:creator>redisnidma</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2010 07:25:08 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20345-sandy-bridge-to-score-low-in-3dmark-11#comment-4933</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>NickThePrick says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20345-sandy-bridge-to-score-low-in-3dmark-11#comment-4905</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I'm a bit concerned about this. If SB really brings decent performance, even for some low end gaming. Then I'm sure future media PCs will use the integrated solution as well. Discrete GPUs will be rising in price as less units are being sold. Then again, we knew of this scenario since Larrabee was first announced, but now its starting to become real. I would really hate to see discrete GPUs disappear. :(]]></description>
			<dc:creator>NickThePrick</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2010 20:30:10 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20345-sandy-bridge-to-score-low-in-3dmark-11#comment-4905</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>darkpulse says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20345-sandy-bridge-to-score-low-in-3dmark-11#comment-4888</link>
			<description><![CDATA[My old Ati 4770 should thrash it to the "core" IMO. :lol: 8) i am not sure the cpu-gpu hybrid can outperform any good discreet graphics card for the time being. I may well stick to my new Ati 5850 till next year and then upgrade it. For now discreet graphics FTW! Hey and fudo are you going to fix the comments problem or not?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>darkpulse</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2010 13:39:56 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20345-sandy-bridge-to-score-low-in-3dmark-11#comment-4888</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>thetruth says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20345-sandy-bridge-to-score-low-in-3dmark-11#comment-4885</link>
			<description><![CDATA[In all honesty, people wanting gaming performance on their PCs are NOT going to choose a CPU/GPU combination. Intel are right for going ahead and making these CPUs for the mainstream instead of trying to appeal to gamers. I believe that this will do wonders for games, where the lowest common denominator still has some degree of gaming performance. But I won't be getting a Sandy Bridge CPU.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>thetruth</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2010 13:13:45 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20345-sandy-bridge-to-score-low-in-3dmark-11#comment-4885</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Alexko says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20345-sandy-bridge-to-score-low-in-3dmark-11#comment-4884</link>
			<description><![CDATA["but 3Dmarks are something that people care about" Are you sure? I think most people stopped caring about 3DMark a while ago. Nowadays it's mostly used for overclocking records. And by the way, if you think people care too much about 3DMark, why do Fudzilla's reviews always include it?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Alexko</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2010 13:09:53 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20345-sandy-bridge-to-score-low-in-3dmark-11#comment-4884</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>leftiszi says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20345-sandy-bridge-to-score-low-in-3dmark-11#comment-4878</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I think it will be slow for 3dmark03. Let alone 3dmark11.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>leftiszi</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2010 11:24:24 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20345-sandy-bridge-to-score-low-in-3dmark-11#comment-4878</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>master811 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20345-sandy-bridge-to-score-low-in-3dmark-11#comment-4876</link>
			<description><![CDATA[It makes perfect sense. The performance will be adequate for most people, but of course, not nearly as good as having a discrete card or even ATI based on-board graphics.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>master811</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2010 10:57:32 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20345-sandy-bridge-to-score-low-in-3dmark-11#comment-4876</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>dan says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20345-sandy-bridge-to-score-low-in-3dmark-11#comment-4875</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Fudo, how can you say the graphics part of SB has "good performance" and then a few lines later that it will lag the competition? This is just ridiculous.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>dan</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2010 10:41:31 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20345-sandy-bridge-to-score-low-in-3dmark-11#comment-4875</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
