<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Wikipedia attacks Wikileaks</title>
		<description>Discuss Wikipedia attacks Wikileaks</description>
		<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20338-wikipedia-attacks-wikileaks</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 19:23:22 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.fudzilla.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_k2/20338/10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>HellFlyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20338-wikipedia-attacks-wikileaks#comment-4998</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Well I like Fudzilla but you're right sometimes its full of fud :D I would recommend Ars Technica , so far they look like the unbiased and knowledgeable tech site :)]]></description>
			<dc:creator>HellFlyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 01 Oct 2010 00:37:13 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20338-wikipedia-attacks-wikileaks#comment-4998</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Fierce Guppy says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20338-wikipedia-attacks-wikileaks#comment-4900</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Nick, This article speaks less about the relationship between Wales and Wikileaks than about Wales and yourself. Was this intentional?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Fierce Guppy</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2010 18:50:44 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20338-wikipedia-attacks-wikileaks#comment-4900</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>ncc1701dee says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20338-wikipedia-attacks-wikileaks#comment-4891</link>
			<description><![CDATA[shut the hell up twistedneck you stupid rednecked american bastard]]></description>
			<dc:creator>ncc1701dee</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2010 14:33:09 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20338-wikipedia-attacks-wikileaks#comment-4891</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>twistedneck says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20338-wikipedia-attacks-wikileaks#comment-4858</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I side against "****leaks" they dont deserve the wiki name. the freaks at the top simply want attention, they could care less about helping society - so get rid of the wiki part of the name and i'll leave them to the military to handle.. since its clear they are not only wasting time, they are killing people in the process. "***leaks" is an answer to a question that nobody asked. they should run and hide from the drones that are flying over their offices next to the spam servers.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>twistedneck</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2010 00:49:16 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20338-wikipedia-attacks-wikileaks#comment-4858</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>bennyfofenny says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20338-wikipedia-attacks-wikileaks#comment-4840</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@ FoxMontage Yeah, anybody got any recommendations ? I'm a long time reader of Fudzilla, but I'm probably looking for a new home now... a website that posts regularly about advances in technology, without constantly writing about shitty consumer electronics (gizmodo), blatantly sucking corporate dick (tomshardware), doing no research behind their stories (arstechnica), or having terrible quality standards (fudzilla).]]></description>
			<dc:creator>bennyfofenny</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 28 Sep 2010 19:06:49 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20338-wikipedia-attacks-wikileaks#comment-4840</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>gamoniac says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20338-wikipedia-attacks-wikileaks#comment-4822</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Nick, Nick, Nick... Seriously, this is about the worst Fudzilla article I have read. Please focus on the tech news and stop adding such baseless personal opinion, or you will lose a once-loyal reader.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>gamoniac</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 28 Sep 2010 16:23:53 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20338-wikipedia-attacks-wikileaks#comment-4822</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>canerpense says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20338-wikipedia-attacks-wikileaks#comment-4821</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Seriously, when did hardware and software reviews become "somebody said something about somebody" paparazzi stuff? You guys need to focus on the technology, not the ones create/use it.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>canerpense</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 28 Sep 2010 16:21:11 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20338-wikipedia-attacks-wikileaks#comment-4821</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>FoxMontage says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20338-wikipedia-attacks-wikileaks#comment-4817</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Oh look. Another sentence on Fudzilla that makes absolutely no sense. This entire article is almost unreadable it's so bad. I can't believe you people are making a living off this. I thought I'd found a replacement for Tomshardware, but I guess I'll just have to keep looking. Can anyone else recommend a real tech news site? Thanks]]></description>
			<dc:creator>FoxMontage</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 28 Sep 2010 15:29:15 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20338-wikipedia-attacks-wikileaks#comment-4817</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>FoxMontage says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20338-wikipedia-attacks-wikileaks#comment-4815</link>
			<description><![CDATA[...]]></description>
			<dc:creator>FoxMontage</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 28 Sep 2010 15:20:45 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20338-wikipedia-attacks-wikileaks#comment-4815</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
