<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>AMD readying at least two Zacate parts</title>
		<description>Discuss AMD readying at least two Zacate parts</description>
		<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20300-amd-readying-at-least-two-zacate-parts</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 23:16:23 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.fudzilla.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_k2/20300/10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>mrgerbik says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20300-amd-readying-at-least-two-zacate-parts#comment-4648</link>
			<description><![CDATA[no gigabit ethernet? sigh .. i guess you can always get an add-in card ... :/]]></description>
			<dc:creator>mrgerbik</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2010 20:37:43 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20300-amd-readying-at-least-two-zacate-parts#comment-4648</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Bl0bb3r says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20300-amd-readying-at-least-two-zacate-parts#comment-4633</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Can't say... I found only speculations, so nothing concrete. One thing might be hardware acceleration for HTML5's video codec.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Bl0bb3r</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2010 16:33:49 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20300-amd-readying-at-least-two-zacate-parts#comment-4633</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>zhfac says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20300-amd-readying-at-least-two-zacate-parts#comment-4629</link>
			<description><![CDATA[What does UVD 3.0 consist of? And somewhat besides the point, will AMD ever fix the problem with playing H.264 SD video with artifacts?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>zhfac</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2010 15:13:18 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20300-amd-readying-at-least-two-zacate-parts#comment-4629</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>nele says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20300-amd-readying-at-least-two-zacate-parts#comment-4626</link>
			<description><![CDATA[You have a point... Considering it's gonna pack HD 5500 series graphics anyway, there's no point in PCIe x16... It should be more than enough for video playback, even some casual gaming, like RTS and MMORPG titles]]></description>
			<dc:creator>nele</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2010 15:01:27 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20300-amd-readying-at-least-two-zacate-parts#comment-4626</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>jeffkro says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20300-amd-readying-at-least-two-zacate-parts#comment-4623</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I guess that makes it future proof, where can you get 4k video?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>jeffkro</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2010 13:34:25 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20300-amd-readying-at-least-two-zacate-parts#comment-4623</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>jeffkro says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20300-amd-readying-at-least-two-zacate-parts#comment-4622</link>
			<description><![CDATA[agreed, this is not the cpu you want for a gaming rig, so I don't see the point of PCIe x16. I'm going to get a ITX version, one stick of ram and install my tv tuner card. It should be simple, low power, and perfect for my needs.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>jeffkro</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2010 13:33:27 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20300-amd-readying-at-least-two-zacate-parts#comment-4622</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>leftiszi says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20300-amd-readying-at-least-two-zacate-parts#comment-4619</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Hey I didn't know I can edit my comment! Cool!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>leftiszi</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2010 13:03:18 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20300-amd-readying-at-least-two-zacate-parts#comment-4619</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>leftiszi says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20300-amd-readying-at-least-two-zacate-parts#comment-4618</link>
			<description><![CDATA[UVD 3.0 as well? Wow! If the 4K video acceleration support rumor, holds any ground, it will be a serious blow to the ego of the competition.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>leftiszi</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2010 13:02:19 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20300-amd-readying-at-least-two-zacate-parts#comment-4618</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Bl0bb3r says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20300-amd-readying-at-least-two-zacate-parts#comment-4607</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Given that these are Atom and i3 competitors, there's nothing to fix, XP. With external graphics you just blew out the main advantage of these SKU's, which is power usage and low heat output.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Bl0bb3r</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2010 11:40:19 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20300-amd-readying-at-least-two-zacate-parts#comment-4607</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Super XP says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20300-amd-readying-at-least-two-zacate-parts#comment-4603</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Impressive though AMD still needs to fix it's platform. What no PCIe x16 for possible External Graphics? Anyway, this should easily beat out Intel's integrated graphics.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Super XP</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2010 11:29:46 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20300-amd-readying-at-least-two-zacate-parts#comment-4603</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
