<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Nvidia is 65 percent Parallel company</title>
		<description>Discuss Nvidia is 65 percent Parallel company</description>
		<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20288-nvidia-is-65-percent-parallel-company</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 11:47:08 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.fudzilla.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_k2/20288/10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>spineless says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20288-nvidia-is-65-percent-parallel-company#comment-4639</link>
			<description><![CDATA[If his goal is to focus on parallel computing, is he looking to be acquired by Cray? AMD can't buy nvidia because that would create a monopoly. Intel wouldn't buy nvidia unless they just wanted to get Jensen to shutup, and the fact that Intel adheres to the Not Invented Here mantra. Intel wouldn't want nvidia's product line, but they wouldn't mind taking all that IP and creating something possibly useful.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>spineless</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2010 18:05:57 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20288-nvidia-is-65-percent-parallel-company#comment-4639</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Jaberwocky says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20288-nvidia-is-65-percent-parallel-company#comment-4588</link>
			<description><![CDATA[oops should have said is.Bad typing fingers]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Jaberwocky</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2010 10:05:22 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20288-nvidia-is-65-percent-parallel-company#comment-4588</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Jaberwocky says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20288-nvidia-is-65-percent-parallel-company#comment-4587</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Yes but i want to know what it Matrox going to do about all this :D]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Jaberwocky</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2010 10:04:39 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20288-nvidia-is-65-percent-parallel-company#comment-4587</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>spede says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20288-nvidia-is-65-percent-parallel-company#comment-4581</link>
			<description><![CDATA[What is this "rarallel computing"? :P]]></description>
			<dc:creator>spede</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2010 07:13:33 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20288-nvidia-is-65-percent-parallel-company#comment-4581</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>The_Countess says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20288-nvidia-is-65-percent-parallel-company#comment-4578</link>
			<description><![CDATA[how was the x800 a flop? or the x1800, or especially the x1900 (which you forgot about it seemed)? and if they were, they are not even in the same league at the Fermi flop. and with their 2013 outlook slide they are basically telling us they are going to do more of the same! your comments on phenom and 4.5years of 'flop' are basically ludicrous. offering better price perform almost across the board isn't a flop.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>The_Countess</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2010 05:32:56 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20288-nvidia-is-65-percent-parallel-company#comment-4578</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Squall_Leonhart says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20288-nvidia-is-65-percent-parallel-company#comment-4572</link>
			<description><![CDATA[And you're just a dense wanka who probably only started following the gfx industry in the last 2 years, not having seen amd/ati be in the exact same position not once, but 3 times. Jens lead nvidia from TNT to Geforce 4 with substantial growth, and hell even through the NV30 flop, that growth didn't stop. 1 flop every 6 generations ain't bad. Considering ATI had 3 flops in a row from its x800 to HD2xxx series, and AMD has had 4 and a half years of Phenom failures with far lower performance to intels offerings in raw ipc. Just stfu and go back to your idiot corner, you don't understand this hardware market. Only hobbyist investors jump at the first sign of trouble.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Squall_Leonhart</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2010 01:59:08 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20288-nvidia-is-65-percent-parallel-company#comment-4572</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Bl0bb3r says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20288-nvidia-is-65-percent-parallel-company#comment-4571</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Then there's also that APU issue... AMD has SP and x86 in one package and is about to launch a shitload of GPGPU-friendly CPU's which will be cheaper to maintain and upgrade than some graphics cards, given their compact form. Intel has Larrabee on trial, devs can play with it, for now it's to complex but the future looks good even for them. Where does nvidia fit in all of this? They might get graphics cards that can do GPGPU alongside... what?... on AMD platforms it will be pointless. Intel processors maybe? What do you know about Intel's on-chip GPUs? Will they remain un-programmable even in the future? Will Intel incorporate some of Larrabee into a successor of Ivy Bridge? That would sure hurt nvidia even more.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Bl0bb3r</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2010 01:57:28 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20288-nvidia-is-65-percent-parallel-company#comment-4571</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Bl0bb3r says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20288-nvidia-is-65-percent-parallel-company#comment-4569</link>
			<description><![CDATA[This is more like the over-population vs need-of-workforce issue. Once we weren't that many, and there was enough work on the entire planet, but we started to overpopulate our Earth and things changed. Take the south-americans which are "shipped" to US for work, leaving US nationals to find whatever they can or fight the issue. In the same way, companies pop-up, they buy hw, some of them don't make it and disappear, while some more pop up. The hardware on the other hand doesn't disappear... and here starts the "over-population" issue, ie the overflooding of the market with pricey Quadros.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Bl0bb3r</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2010 01:50:02 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20288-nvidia-is-65-percent-parallel-company#comment-4569</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Bl0bb3r says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20288-nvidia-is-65-percent-parallel-company#comment-4568</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Because graphics chips are sold to millions of OEM'ed computers, laptops and consoles. That they made this year a lot of earning on non-VC, fine... but don't expect this trend to last. Gaming outfits have to shell out a lot of cash for the dedicated hardware, never-mind the software... but they do it only at the initial investment, from there on, the companies in question can go bankrupt and release the game, barely float to be successful, or get bought. Just remember that that hardware will not land in dumps. It will be resold and reused, and another reinvestment will be done once they will become relatively hard to work with, ie obsolete, given their price.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Bl0bb3r</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2010 01:42:45 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20288-nvidia-is-65-percent-parallel-company#comment-4568</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>nasrudin says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20288-nvidia-is-65-percent-parallel-company#comment-4559</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Wait, have you actually read the fiscal reports on NV's earnings? Why on earth would you think visual computing (or at least more specifically games) still makes most of their money?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>nasrudin</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 23 Sep 2010 23:14:10 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20288-nvidia-is-65-percent-parallel-company#comment-4559</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
