<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>AMD intros four low-power Athlons</title>
		<description>Discuss AMD intros four low-power Athlons</description>
		<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20286-amd-intros-four-low-power-athlons</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 19:36:35 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.fudzilla.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_k2/20286/10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>nele says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20286-amd-intros-four-low-power-athlons#comment-4564</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Yes, provided you have a board that can undervolt well. Eliot made the same conclusion in several reviews, so it's definitely a better option for tech savvy users. Also, "u" series Athlons are way too expensive compared to "e" series parts and it's not easy to recommend them for regular users...]]></description>
			<dc:creator>nele</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 23 Sep 2010 23:53:17 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20286-amd-intros-four-low-power-athlons#comment-4564</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>mrgerbik says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20286-amd-intros-four-low-power-athlons#comment-4547</link>
			<description><![CDATA[If anyone knows anything about Regor lineup, you'll know that almost all (if not all) of these chips can be undervolted to 1.0v-1.2v and still function at stock speeds. This means you can have your low power cpu while paying alot less. You can underclock it as well and get in the 20-30W range if you so desire...]]></description>
			<dc:creator>mrgerbik</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 23 Sep 2010 19:18:42 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20286-amd-intros-four-low-power-athlons#comment-4547</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Nubstick says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20286-amd-intros-four-low-power-athlons#comment-4536</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Where can one buy these athlon II U series processors?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Nubstick</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 23 Sep 2010 16:24:53 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20286-amd-intros-four-low-power-athlons#comment-4536</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>jeffkro says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20286-amd-intros-four-low-power-athlons#comment-4529</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Anyone have a chart comparing the idle power consumption 25W TDP athlon II's to the older 65W athlon II's? I have a plane jane athlon II 250.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>jeffkro</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 23 Sep 2010 15:05:13 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20286-amd-intros-four-low-power-athlons#comment-4529</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Bl0bb3r says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20286-amd-intros-four-low-power-athlons#comment-4524</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Bern, is there any difference for you between the letters E and U? They are named right: 250u @ 1.6 GHz 25W 260u @ 1.8 GHz 25W 270u @ 2.0 GHz 25W 240e @ 2.8 GHz 45W 250e @ 3.0 GHz 45W]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Bl0bb3r</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 23 Sep 2010 14:33:59 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20286-amd-intros-four-low-power-athlons#comment-4524</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>AndreiD says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20286-amd-intros-four-low-power-athlons#comment-4522</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Or you people could stop saying stupid stuff like "AMD should turn all of their products to low TDP variants" when they're doing fine price/performance wise. And how is the 270U name misleading? Notice that there is an U there to inform you that the offering is a very low power variant.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>AndreiD</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 23 Sep 2010 14:27:53 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20286-amd-intros-four-low-power-athlons#comment-4522</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>canerpense says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20286-amd-intros-four-low-power-athlons#comment-4512</link>
			<description><![CDATA[-3 AMD fanboys at work. Banhammer needs to be polished. Update: -13 See what i mean now?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>canerpense</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 23 Sep 2010 13:33:48 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20286-amd-intros-four-low-power-athlons#comment-4512</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>dtzy says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20286-amd-intros-four-low-power-athlons#comment-4510</link>
			<description><![CDATA[AMD should just turn all their existing products to low tdp variants.. They can't compete performance wise with Intel at the moment anyway. But I guess that's impossible.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>dtzy</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 23 Sep 2010 13:18:50 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20286-amd-intros-four-low-power-athlons#comment-4510</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>bbo320 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20286-amd-intros-four-low-power-athlons#comment-4506</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I agree Bernard. Unfortunately, I know of no rhyme or reason for the naming scheme of these processors.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>bbo320</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 23 Sep 2010 13:07:26 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20286-amd-intros-four-low-power-athlons#comment-4506</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>BernardP says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20286-amd-intros-four-low-power-athlons#comment-4501</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I wonder why they chose the misleading "Athlon II X2 270u" name for a 2.0 GHZ part. According to their own usage, the "270" should be clocked at 3.4 GHz. The 3.0 GHz 250e is correctly named. A 2.0 GHZ Athlon II X2 should wear the "200" suffix: Athlon II X2 200u]]></description>
			<dc:creator>BernardP</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 23 Sep 2010 12:14:56 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20286-amd-intros-four-low-power-athlons#comment-4501</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
