<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Nvidia details performance improvements of new GPU architectures</title>
		<description>Discuss Nvidia details performance improvements of new GPU architectures</description>
		<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20258-nvidia-reveals-gpu-codenames-up-until-2013</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 11:00:07 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.fudzilla.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_k2/20258/10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>oldegg says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20258-nvidia-reveals-gpu-codenames-up-until-2013#comment-4397</link>
			<description><![CDATA[a company currently with no decent product to offer could only afford to talk about the distant future.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>oldegg</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 Sep 2010 13:20:07 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20258-nvidia-reveals-gpu-codenames-up-until-2013#comment-4397</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Nerdmaster says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20258-nvidia-reveals-gpu-codenames-up-until-2013#comment-4393</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Are you kidding me? Adding more transistors to a single die and you get an exponential increase to the cost.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Nerdmaster</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 Sep 2010 11:41:18 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20258-nvidia-reveals-gpu-codenames-up-until-2013#comment-4393</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Alexko says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20258-nvidia-reveals-gpu-codenames-up-until-2013#comment-4379</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Nope. It would be on the GTX 480, except DP is crippled on GeForce products, so 515 DP GFLOPS is the best Fermi can do in practice. Besides, even if if were 672 GFLOPS, that's still not 768!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Alexko</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 Sep 2010 08:05:06 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20258-nvidia-reveals-gpu-codenames-up-until-2013#comment-4379</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Squall_Leonhart says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20258-nvidia-reveals-gpu-codenames-up-until-2013#comment-4353</link>
			<description><![CDATA[its closer to 670Gflops]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Squall_Leonhart</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 21 Sep 2010 23:54:47 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20258-nvidia-reveals-gpu-codenames-up-until-2013#comment-4353</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Super XP says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20258-nvidia-reveals-gpu-codenames-up-until-2013#comment-4352</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I wonder how AMD's future GPU code name Cyclops architecture is going to compete with NVIDIA's offerings.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Super XP</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 21 Sep 2010 23:38:53 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20258-nvidia-reveals-gpu-codenames-up-until-2013#comment-4352</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Alexko says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20258-nvidia-reveals-gpu-codenames-up-until-2013#comment-4346</link>
			<description><![CDATA["Fermi is rated at 768GFLOPS peak." No, it isn't. "Double Precision floating point performance (peak):	515 Gflops" And I'm not the one saying that, NVIDIA is: http://www.nvidia.com/object/product_tesla_C2050_C2070_us.html > specifications.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Alexko</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 21 Sep 2010 22:53:39 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20258-nvidia-reveals-gpu-codenames-up-until-2013#comment-4346</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>spede says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20258-nvidia-reveals-gpu-codenames-up-until-2013#comment-4336</link>
			<description><![CDATA["is expected to deliver 3-4x the performance-per-watt of Fermi" That should happen pretty much automatically switching from 40nm to 28nm. AMD will get to 28nm first as usual.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>spede</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 21 Sep 2010 21:56:11 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20258-nvidia-reveals-gpu-codenames-up-until-2013#comment-4336</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>yourma2000 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20258-nvidia-reveals-gpu-codenames-up-until-2013#comment-4325</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Everytime I hear Nvidia it's always about GPGPU and CUDA, But what about gaming and gamers?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>yourma2000</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 21 Sep 2010 21:06:16 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20258-nvidia-reveals-gpu-codenames-up-until-2013#comment-4325</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>spineless says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20258-nvidia-reveals-gpu-codenames-up-until-2013#comment-4324</link>
			<description><![CDATA[AMD just won]]></description>
			<dc:creator>spineless</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 21 Sep 2010 20:55:25 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20258-nvidia-reveals-gpu-codenames-up-until-2013#comment-4324</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>FnuGk says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20258-nvidia-reveals-gpu-codenames-up-until-2013#comment-4323</link>
			<description><![CDATA[FINALLY they started thinking about performance-per-watt]]></description>
			<dc:creator>FnuGk</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 21 Sep 2010 20:48:31 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20258-nvidia-reveals-gpu-codenames-up-until-2013#comment-4323</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
