<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Fusion Swift 45nm didn’t work </title>
		<description>Discuss Fusion Swift 45nm didn’t work </description>
		<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20202-fusion-swift-45nm-didn’t-work</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 02:51:43 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.fudzilla.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_k2/20202/10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>nele says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20202-fusion-swift-45nm-didn’t-work#comment-4098</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Uhm, what's 'dirt' it this particular article? The fact that AMD made the right call and moved on to more promising designs? Or that those new parts seem to be very good indeed?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>nele</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 16 Sep 2010 15:19:18 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20202-fusion-swift-45nm-didn’t-work#comment-4098</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Bl0bb3r says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20202-fusion-swift-45nm-didn’t-work#comment-4052</link>
			<description><![CDATA[More dirt, FUDtzy? This news would've been good in 2009 when Swift did its magic act. But now? Oh brother, you must be really desperate to put AMD down. Too bad most of your readers laugh in your face.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Bl0bb3r</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 16 Sep 2010 07:07:57 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20202-fusion-swift-45nm-didn’t-work#comment-4052</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>nforce4max says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20202-fusion-swift-45nm-didn’t-work#comment-4047</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Barcelona wasn't a total failure but had it been any worse AMD might be in even worse than it was before the Phenom 2. They need to improve on bringing competitive products to market sooner or they can only settle for second best and I don't want Intel to continue setting industry standards and pricing indefinitely. This is why all the other x86 compliant non Intel cpus don't perform as well as they should. Intel stiff competitors on by leaving out code but only providing basic compatibility.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>nforce4max</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 16 Sep 2010 03:07:41 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20202-fusion-swift-45nm-didn’t-work#comment-4047</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>redisnidma says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20202-fusion-swift-45nm-didn’t-work#comment-4019</link>
			<description><![CDATA[It's a pity AMD didn't apply this rule to Barcelona/Phenom. Otherwise they wouldn't have being in the mess the are right now.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>redisnidma</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 15 Sep 2010 21:26:59 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20202-fusion-swift-45nm-didn’t-work#comment-4019</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>AndreiD says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20202-fusion-swift-45nm-didn’t-work#comment-4012</link>
			<description><![CDATA[It's better to cancel a faulty architecture than go ahead with it... *Ahem nVidia*]]></description>
			<dc:creator>AndreiD</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 15 Sep 2010 20:29:45 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20202-fusion-swift-45nm-didn’t-work#comment-4012</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
