<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>New logo for 2nd generation Core processors</title>
		<description>Discuss New logo for 2nd generation Core processors</description>
		<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20154-new-logo-for-2nd-generation-core-processors</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 07:13:33 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.fudzilla.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_k2/20154/10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>samedi says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20154-new-logo-for-2nd-generation-core-processors#comment-3936</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Intel: Ohai, we got new logos, this means our new processors are going to be super awesome! ;-)]]></description>
			<dc:creator>samedi</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 14 Sep 2010 22:07:24 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20154-new-logo-for-2nd-generation-core-processors#comment-3936</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Bl0bb3r says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20154-new-logo-for-2nd-generation-core-processors#comment-3873</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Hm bastards... notice how they've highlighted the video processing bit in the upper-left corner. I'm getting where the "Visibility Smart" is from. Shhhh... I know their secret now!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Bl0bb3r</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 14 Sep 2010 09:12:16 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20154-new-logo-for-2nd-generation-core-processors#comment-3873</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Squall_Leonhart says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20154-new-logo-for-2nd-generation-core-processors#comment-3867</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Paul needs his head examined. with a car crusher.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Squall_Leonhart</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 14 Sep 2010 04:02:54 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20154-new-logo-for-2nd-generation-core-processors#comment-3867</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>trancer23 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20154-new-logo-for-2nd-generation-core-processors#comment-3842</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Hmmm interesting but "what took hours and minutes with Westmere 32nm processor will take mere seconds with Sandy Bridge" I cant see there being a 60+ fold increase in processing power between one generation?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>trancer23</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 13 Sep 2010 20:04:40 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20154-new-logo-for-2nd-generation-core-processors#comment-3842</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>yasin says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20154-new-logo-for-2nd-generation-core-processors#comment-3830</link>
			<description><![CDATA[im gonna get me one.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>yasin</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 13 Sep 2010 18:31:24 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20154-new-logo-for-2nd-generation-core-processors#comment-3830</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>hellfire says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20154-new-logo-for-2nd-generation-core-processors#comment-3828</link>
			<description><![CDATA[i like it, overall. notably different]]></description>
			<dc:creator>hellfire</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 13 Sep 2010 18:22:34 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20154-new-logo-for-2nd-generation-core-processors#comment-3828</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
