<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Via to release quad cores next year</title>
		<description>Discuss Via to release quad cores next year</description>
		<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20085-via-to-release-quad-cores-next-year</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 May 2013 04:59:20 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.fudzilla.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_k2/20085/10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>Alereon says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20085-via-to-release-quad-cores-next-year#comment-3567</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Realistically, there just isn't a market for low-performance x86 mobile chips anymore. AMD's Bobcat and upcoming, potentially non-crappy versions of the Intel Atom have that market sewn up, along with excellent power-efficiency. The ARM Cortex A9-MP dual-core CPUs are going to own the non-Windows smartbook/netbook/notebook market, and nVidia's Tegra 5 should bring Windows to the ARM platform with the ability to execute x86 code on its ARM Cortex A10 64-bit processor, thanks to Transmeta's Code Morphing technology. Of course, this depends on nVidia's ability to actually execute on these plans, something they've proven quite incapable of doing thus far. All-in-all, there's no room for Via. Reminds me of the song, "anything you can do, I can do better..."]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Alereon</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 11:34:33 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20085-via-to-release-quad-cores-next-year#comment-3567</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>JAB Creations says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20085-via-to-release-quad-cores-next-year#comment-3555</link>
			<description><![CDATA[AMD released the first quad core, Intel's first "quad core" was a dual-dual core. So Intel took the "cheap" road however it should also be noted that AMD had difficulty producing quads at 65nm. So frankly that's more of a tie with kudos for AMD facing an viciously anti-competitive company such as Intel. Also the way this article is written makes it sound like Via is a direct competitor to AMD and Intel, it's not. Via focuses on low power CPU's, audio, and network chips in example. It's probably not in Via's best interest to have started designing quads immediately after AMD and Intel introduced theirs. Mobile will always be a few years behind the desktop platform.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>JAB Creations</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 08:26:58 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20085-via-to-release-quad-cores-next-year#comment-3555</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>johndgr says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20085-via-to-release-quad-cores-next-year#comment-3495</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Really too bad. They lost their chance when they left the door open for Nvidia to enter the AMD chipsets market. Add Intel's monopoly tactics and here we are. They are going the... SiS way.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>johndgr</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 13:26:53 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20085-via-to-release-quad-cores-next-year#comment-3495</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Blacky says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20085-via-to-release-quad-cores-next-year#comment-3482</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Too bad for them... I wanted to buy a nettop with a VIA CPU.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Blacky</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 11:23:07 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20085-via-to-release-quad-cores-next-year#comment-3482</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
