<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Point of View / TGT GTX 460 Ultra Charged and Beast tested</title>
		<description>Discuss Point of View / TGT GTX 460 Ultra Charged and Beast tested</description>
		<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20021-point-of-view-/-tgt-gtx-460-ultra-charged-and-beast-tested</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 16:31:05 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.fudzilla.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_k2/20021/10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>Nerdmaster says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20021-point-of-view-/-tgt-gtx-460-ultra-charged-and-beast-tested#comment-4892</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Also Nvidia in order to beat the upcoming 6870 should release a full 384 sp GF104 and clock it at 1GHz and call it 460 Bitch version.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Nerdmaster</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2010 14:35:16 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20021-point-of-view-/-tgt-gtx-460-ultra-charged-and-beast-tested#comment-4892</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Nerdmaster says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20021-point-of-view-/-tgt-gtx-460-ultra-charged-and-beast-tested#comment-4890</link>
			<description><![CDATA[460 GTX beast is a mainstreem card and no overclock will make it high end. Just compare it with 480 GTX. Wait until 6770 comes out which will probably be on par with the beast version while drowing 50 - 60W less power according the rumors that are floating around.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Nerdmaster</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2010 14:32:26 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20021-point-of-view-/-tgt-gtx-460-ultra-charged-and-beast-tested#comment-4890</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Jaberwocky says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20021-point-of-view-/-tgt-gtx-460-ultra-charged-and-beast-tested#comment-3118</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Can't see the point of these overclocked cards at that price point.I picked up a very nice Gigabyte 1GB GTX460 at £170 Delivered.I can clock that to 820Mhz and 4Ghz for the memory should the game demand it.That is very good value for money in my book.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Jaberwocky</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 21:28:45 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20021-point-of-view-/-tgt-gtx-460-ultra-charged-and-beast-tested#comment-3118</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>blandead says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20021-point-of-view-/-tgt-gtx-460-ultra-charged-and-beast-tested#comment-3108</link>
			<description><![CDATA[not very impressed looking at the metro2033 scores, I'll wait for next-gen cards.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>blandead</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 17:56:04 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20021-point-of-view-/-tgt-gtx-460-ultra-charged-and-beast-tested#comment-3108</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>ASilver says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20021-point-of-view-/-tgt-gtx-460-ultra-charged-and-beast-tested#comment-3100</link>
			<description><![CDATA[If your priority is bragging rights, it is the card for you, but if not, then for the same amount I'd get the 470, since the charts are comparing them to a reference 470, meaning with no overclock yet.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>ASilver</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 16:59:44 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20021-point-of-view-/-tgt-gtx-460-ultra-charged-and-beast-tested#comment-3100</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
