<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Radeon HD 6000 is an evolutionary design</title>
		<description>Discuss Radeon HD 6000 is an evolutionary design</description>
		<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20006-radeon-hd-6000-is-an-evolution-chip</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 19:51:15 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.fudzilla.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_k2/20006/10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>bobrollins says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20006-radeon-hd-6000-is-an-evolution-chip#comment-3742</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Maybe Charlie isn't feeding them enough over at Semiaccurate and they keep straying away.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>bobrollins</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 22:20:14 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20006-radeon-hd-6000-is-an-evolution-chip#comment-3742</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>aussiebear says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20006-radeon-hd-6000-is-an-evolution-chip#comment-3129</link>
			<description><![CDATA[This is "Southern Islands" (Radeon HD 6xxx)...This GPU series is a "stop-gap" product because TSMC was having issues in making the 40nm to 32nm transition. (TSMC has decided to skip 32nm and go to 28nm)...Hence the reason why the Radeon HD 6xxx will still be made in 40nm process. "Nothern Islands" (Radeon HD 7xxx) will be the revolution (new architecture in 28nm process). I'm holding out for the latter GPU, and AMD's Bulldozer. :)]]></description>
			<dc:creator>aussiebear</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 22:27:58 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20006-radeon-hd-6000-is-an-evolution-chip#comment-3129</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>kartikkg says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20006-radeon-hd-6000-is-an-evolution-chip#comment-3097</link>
			<description><![CDATA[seems like all thumbs up go only to those who praise ATI/AMD]]></description>
			<dc:creator>kartikkg</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 16:41:22 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20006-radeon-hd-6000-is-an-evolution-chip#comment-3097</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>yourma2000 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20006-radeon-hd-6000-is-an-evolution-chip#comment-3064</link>
			<description><![CDATA[The HD 5000 used SIMD shaders, google it if you like]]></description>
			<dc:creator>yourma2000</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 10:40:52 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20006-radeon-hd-6000-is-an-evolution-chip#comment-3064</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Squall_Leonhart says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20006-radeon-hd-6000-is-an-evolution-chip#comment-3060</link>
			<description><![CDATA[shaders are always MIMD, it was the kernel scheduler that was SIMD.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Squall_Leonhart</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 08:15:40 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20006-radeon-hd-6000-is-an-evolution-chip#comment-3060</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>WiseInvestor says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20006-radeon-hd-6000-is-an-evolution-chip#comment-3057</link>
			<description><![CDATA[The new HD 6000 series should also benefit from newer faster GDDR5 mem from Hynix. Btarunr, News Editor from Techpowerup pointed out those could be leading-edge 40nm memory chips from Hynix. "...It operates at 7 Gbps (Gigabit per second) bandwidth and processes up to 28 GB/s (Gigabytes per second) with a 32-bit I/O. In addition to its fastest speed and highest density, it is also designed to minimize power consumption with 1.35V operation voltage.... which reduces energy consumption by 20% over the preceding memory solutions using 50nm class technology." http://forums.techpowerup.com/showthread.php?t=129668]]></description>
			<dc:creator>WiseInvestor</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 07:09:05 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20006-radeon-hd-6000-is-an-evolution-chip#comment-3057</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>BorgOvermind says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20006-radeon-hd-6000-is-an-evolution-chip#comment-3056</link>
			<description><![CDATA[The new cards are ~30% faster and significantly faster in tesselation. nV can't match that performance. A fully unlocked GF104 would be between 5850 and 5870 and a 512-shader GF100 is unmanufacturabe and would not be anything more then 5% improvement. If the 6k series get out fast enough, nV is out from the desktop market for another year. So far they only keep it alive with the GF104/460. While they finish the rest of the line, AMD will start to intro second generation cards. So it's bad for nV for now. They'll probably be back when 28nm process will be buildable.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>BorgOvermind</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 06:32:34 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20006-radeon-hd-6000-is-an-evolution-chip#comment-3056</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>yourma2000 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20006-radeon-hd-6000-is-an-evolution-chip#comment-3037</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Twistedneck This time they're using MIMD (Multiple Information Multiple Data) shaders, AMD previously used SIMD (Single Information Multiple Data) shaders, the advantage of this is that each shader can individually focus on a certain task rather than sharing the task between the shaders, so a couple could be doing geometry, others could to be tessellation and some could be doing dynamic lighting etc all at the same time, it's more efficient and better performing rather than throwing tasks at the whole GPU. There's all sorts of other and minor changers aswell but this is probably the biggest.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>yourma2000</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 22:00:09 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20006-radeon-hd-6000-is-an-evolution-chip#comment-3037</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Regenweald says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20006-radeon-hd-6000-is-an-evolution-chip#comment-3036</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Nvidia is still struggling to complete their Fermi linup, I honestly think they don't have an answer for SI, at best they may try a rename. Maybe for NI they will have something new.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Regenweald</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 21:50:37 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20006-radeon-hd-6000-is-an-evolution-chip#comment-3036</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>twistedneck says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20006-radeon-hd-6000-is-an-evolution-chip#comment-3030</link>
			<description><![CDATA[It looks WAY faster in tesselation than the 5000 series, what would cause that? are they still using the single tesselation chip or are they doing the distributed core thing like Nvidia? My bigger question is what will Nvidia do to respond? an unlocked and faster 512 core gtx485 or 490 would be a fine competitor.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>twistedneck</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 20:30:40 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/20006-radeon-hd-6000-is-an-evolution-chip#comment-3030</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
