<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Sandy Bridge Core i7 2600K name explained </title>
		<description>Discuss Sandy Bridge Core i7 2600K name explained </description>
		<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19914-sandy-bridge-core-i7-2600k-name-explained</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 05:50:45 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.fudzilla.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_k2/19914/10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>Naterm says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19914-sandy-bridge-core-i7-2600k-name-explained#comment-2665</link>
			<description><![CDATA[First off, have you heard that Sandy Bridge DT is going to lock overclocking? Because Fud said the same exact thing about Lynnfield and that certainly didn't happen. I wouldn't worry about it until it's actually confirmed and I don't believe it's likely. Especially when you considering they're already talking about unlocked K-series chips. Second, people don't seem to understand that there are multiple Sandy Bridge variants. The version talked about here (2600K) belongs Sandy Bridge DT which will be LGA1155. Later in 2011, you'll have the launch of Sandy Bridge B2, EN, and EP processors. These are the big boys that slot into LGA2011 and have 6-cores/13-threads or 8-cores/16-threads.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Naterm</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 03:24:35 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19914-sandy-bridge-core-i7-2600k-name-explained#comment-2665</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>anno says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19914-sandy-bridge-core-i7-2600k-name-explained#comment-2661</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I was thinking same thing - Sandy Bridge is more like, the fourth generation of the same architecture line. It will be the second generation of the naming scheme though - which is not very exciting... I'm glad Intel names things the GPU way now, with generations and such, but it could sure use some more consistency. Right now some parts have the same number, yet are clocked differently due to a suffix. A bit confusing, that.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>anno</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 00:18:50 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19914-sandy-bridge-core-i7-2600k-name-explained#comment-2661</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Naterm says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19914-sandy-bridge-core-i7-2600k-name-explained#comment-2660</link>
			<description><![CDATA[These Sandy Bridge chips are meant to succeed the current Lynnfield processors. LGA2011 processors (Sandy Bridge B2) launch in Q3 '11 with 8-cores/16-threads and quad channel memory controllers. Intel is going for the bulk of the market with mainstream desktop and mobile processors first, then high-end desktop and 2S servers later. Laptops are quickly displacing desktops and intel is already crushing AMD in 2S servers. Hence they can wait.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Naterm</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 00:02:52 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19914-sandy-bridge-core-i7-2600k-name-explained#comment-2660</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>BernardP says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19914-sandy-bridge-core-i7-2600k-name-explained#comment-2653</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Nothing official yet, but... This article says (last paragraph) that Bulldozer will not be compatible with the current AM3 socket. But current AM2/AM3 processors will be compatible with the AM3r socket: http://www.rage3d.com/articles/amd_heat_vision_hot_chips_22/index.php?p=5 "For the desktop, the Zambezi (Bulldozer) processor is good news and bad news. The good news is it's an 8 core product, the bad news is it needs a new socket - AM3r, or AM3+. This is an electrical upgrade of the AM3 platform, to provide the power phases and planes/states required by the power gating features of Zambezi" I think AMD might not be too unhappy that many current AM3 buyers believe that they will have a drop-in upgrade to Bulldozer...]]></description>
			<dc:creator>BernardP</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 21:46:34 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19914-sandy-bridge-core-i7-2600k-name-explained#comment-2653</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>turingpest says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19914-sandy-bridge-core-i7-2600k-name-explained#comment-2646</link>
			<description><![CDATA[i don't. socket am2+ was called am2r2 in roadmaps and stars architecture was compatible. bulldozer has been detailed as using socket am3r2 as BernardP points out, which therefore seems likely to be am3+. i'd bet my house that bulldozer arch will be compatible in some form with am3 boards. or let me put it another way - intel 1156 boards are definitely not compatible with sandy bridge, and so going am3 was a calculated (and in my opinion low) risk.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>turingpest</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 19:41:19 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19914-sandy-bridge-core-i7-2600k-name-explained#comment-2646</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Bl0bb3r says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19914-sandy-bridge-core-i7-2600k-name-explained#comment-2633</link>
			<description><![CDATA[That remains to be seen... I agree that there will be new packages, but it's also doable on the current AM3 socket.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Bl0bb3r</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 14:41:19 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19914-sandy-bridge-core-i7-2600k-name-explained#comment-2633</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>The_Wolf88 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19914-sandy-bridge-core-i7-2600k-name-explained#comment-2631</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I doubt that ! AMD bulldozer architecture won't be compatible with AM2+ and AM3 sockets ! Because they will come in totally new packages !]]></description>
			<dc:creator>The_Wolf88</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 14:17:38 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19914-sandy-bridge-core-i7-2600k-name-explained#comment-2631</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Bl0bb3r says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19914-sandy-bridge-core-i7-2600k-name-explained#comment-2628</link>
			<description><![CDATA[You're talking about the core or platform? If it's the platform, then yes, Bulldozer is going after Sandy. If it's the core than a 2 BD cores (4 cores) can spank Nehalem 1156 several ways and hopefully at a better price.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Bl0bb3r</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 13:37:39 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19914-sandy-bridge-core-i7-2600k-name-explained#comment-2628</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Squall_Leonhart says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19914-sandy-bridge-core-i7-2600k-name-explained#comment-2627</link>
			<description><![CDATA[the 1366 socket pinout can only handle up to 3 channels of DDR while LGA 2011 allows for the expanded logic for the new quad controller in the new high end Sandy Bridge processors.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Squall_Leonhart</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 13:34:52 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19914-sandy-bridge-core-i7-2600k-name-explained#comment-2627</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>ghelyar says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19914-sandy-bridge-core-i7-2600k-name-explained#comment-2615</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Wouldn't that be "Core 2", as in Conroe Merom etc. "Core" (1) being Yonah etc If this is the second generation of anything it would be the second generation of "Core i"]]></description>
			<dc:creator>ghelyar</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 12:48:23 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19914-sandy-bridge-core-i7-2600k-name-explained#comment-2615</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
