<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Apple forced to improve graphics</title>
		<description>Discuss Apple forced to improve graphics</description>
		<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19879-apple-forced-to-improve-graphics</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 07:59:16 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.fudzilla.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_k2/19879/10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>ATInazis says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19879-apple-forced-to-improve-graphics#comment-2705</link>
			<description><![CDATA[every mac is too weak for those games except for the macpro.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>ATInazis</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 16:27:16 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19879-apple-forced-to-improve-graphics#comment-2705</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Naterm says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19879-apple-forced-to-improve-graphics#comment-2655</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Can that XPS run Final Cut Pro? Nope, sure can't. Can it run Aperture? A lot of people that do important stuff (ie, not gaming) buy Macs because they're really good for it. Yes, Apple uses X58 and they actually got the original Nehalem Xeons before anyone else. They were kinda slow to the Westmere-EP chips, but no one really knows why. You people just don't understand that a Mac Pro is not a gaming machine just like high-end graphics and video workstations from HP or Dell are not gaming machines.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Naterm</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 21:58:37 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19879-apple-forced-to-improve-graphics#comment-2655</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Sinister213 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19879-apple-forced-to-improve-graphics#comment-2593</link>
			<description><![CDATA[apple has always been the laughing stock of the gaming world. my friend has a $5.5k tower with dual xeons.....and i don't even know what for a graphics card. i bought him metro 2033 as a gift and lets just say it was the worst (and funniest) gift i could have gotten. How embarrassing for mac. have they even moved to the x58 set? anyway. my xps was 2500 less and is about 2500 times better. still love my iphone4 but apple will never be in a comparable position graphically. personally i dont think they care. as long as they have their niche market. can't wait to see 480's running crysis 2. apple just needs to stick to photo editing. lmao.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Sinister213</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2010 23:20:18 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19879-apple-forced-to-improve-graphics#comment-2593</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>FistOfGod says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19879-apple-forced-to-improve-graphics#comment-2565</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I cannot fathom what can prevent Apple from giving customers that little bit more. AFAIK ATi makes Radeon 5870m these days, so how come Apple is so horrendously stingy? I mean 5750 in a £2,5k desktop? It's offensive, if nothing else...]]></description>
			<dc:creator>FistOfGod</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2010 15:35:32 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19879-apple-forced-to-improve-graphics#comment-2565</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Bl0bb3r says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19879-apple-forced-to-improve-graphics#comment-2526</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Naterm, mac fanboyz did say a lot of times how great the graphics are on Mac. Also, some of them like to play games... take PhillyD for example. He's a content creator using one or more macs but has an Xbox to play games. Now how fu is that!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Bl0bb3r</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 22 Aug 2010 15:44:03 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19879-apple-forced-to-improve-graphics#comment-2526</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Naterm says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19879-apple-forced-to-improve-graphics#comment-2499</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Who in the hell said the Mac had better graphics than the PC? Anyone could have just looked at the specs on the relevant hardware and realized it usually isn't the case. Also, people, it's Mac. MAC stands for Media Access Control. It's the globally unique, 48-bit address assigned to an ethernet port. Furthermore, why would you want Quad SLI in a Mac Pro? It's a content creation box. You don't see three or four GTX480s in high-end workstations from HP or Dell. It's not what they're for. Now why Apple has refused to offer stock configurations with Quadro cards for the last few years, that's a valid question.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Naterm</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 21 Aug 2010 03:20:53 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19879-apple-forced-to-improve-graphics#comment-2499</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Fud_u says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19879-apple-forced-to-improve-graphics#comment-2495</link>
			<description><![CDATA[You get half of your money worth with a Mac.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Fud_u</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 23:54:35 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19879-apple-forced-to-improve-graphics#comment-2495</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>eXistential says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19879-apple-forced-to-improve-graphics#comment-2464</link>
			<description><![CDATA[All i got to say is AHAHAHAHAHA. Ignorant fanboys..]]></description>
			<dc:creator>eXistential</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 18:37:58 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19879-apple-forced-to-improve-graphics#comment-2464</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Regenweald says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19879-apple-forced-to-improve-graphics#comment-2447</link>
			<description><![CDATA[For years people have been totally confused by Apple's shiney and smooth GUI and Adobe products optimized for the MAC platform. Credit to Apple. Cat's out of the bag now though.....]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Regenweald</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 13:09:51 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19879-apple-forced-to-improve-graphics#comment-2447</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>ghelyar says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19879-apple-forced-to-improve-graphics#comment-2441</link>
			<description><![CDATA[What people? Macs have never been up to PCs for graphics. For years they were using 8800 GTs etc. Even now, the best graphics you can put in a Mac Pro are a 5870. Not exactly quad SLI.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>ghelyar</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 12:17:32 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19879-apple-forced-to-improve-graphics#comment-2441</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
