<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>ATI's 28nm to be built in GF and TSMC</title>
		<description>Discuss ATI's 28nm to be built in GF and TSMC</description>
		<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19863-atis-28nm-to-be-built-in-gf-and-tsmc</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 14:50:29 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.fudzilla.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_k2/19863/10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>ATInazis says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19863-atis-28nm-to-be-built-in-gf-and-tsmc#comment-2707</link>
			<description><![CDATA[i hope nvidia would keep tsmc, both should have their own. Every fab could produce for one chip manufacture instead two sharing one.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>ATInazis</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 16:35:33 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19863-atis-28nm-to-be-built-in-gf-and-tsmc#comment-2707</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>azrael says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19863-atis-28nm-to-be-built-in-gf-and-tsmc#comment-2532</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Can't really see how GloFo will have a harder task at doing 28nm than TSMC (as implied in the artice). Remember TSMC has (had?) severe difficulties even pulling off 40nm.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>azrael</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2010 09:07:19 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19863-atis-28nm-to-be-built-in-gf-and-tsmc#comment-2532</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>The_Countess says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19863-atis-28nm-to-be-built-in-gf-and-tsmc#comment-2429</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I did mention GF... I also assumed people had read the article and didn't need me to mention ATI is going to use GF and TSMC... it was also implied when i mentioned nvidia is betting on a single horse(thereby implying their competition is betting on at least 2) I'm not sure what else you want me to do. assume less intelligence in the people who read the comments here? maybe you were confused as to which "both" east17 or i meant? well both the boths(nvidia/ATI and tsmc/GF) are skipping 32nm.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>The_Countess</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 11:02:16 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19863-atis-28nm-to-be-built-in-gf-and-tsmc#comment-2429</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Alexko says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19863-atis-28nm-to-be-built-in-gf-and-tsmc#comment-2418</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Jen-Hsun Huang has made it pretty clear that he doesn't intend to use GloFo. I think his exact words were "Our strategy is TSMC.[...] GlobalFoundries is AMD's foundry, right?".]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Alexko</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 00:09:59 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19863-atis-28nm-to-be-built-in-gf-and-tsmc#comment-2418</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Jurassic1024 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19863-atis-28nm-to-be-built-in-gf-and-tsmc#comment-2416</link>
			<description><![CDATA[WE?! After reading the article, how were you not able to also mention GF? It blows my mind. Do you often read articles then reword them to make them your own? On a side note: TSMC has announced they will skip 22nm and instead use 20nm due to better performance to cost ratio. The most obvious route isn't always the best one.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Jurassic1024</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 22:33:44 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19863-atis-28nm-to-be-built-in-gf-and-tsmc#comment-2416</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Nerdfighter says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19863-atis-28nm-to-be-built-in-gf-and-tsmc#comment-2413</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ATI will release 2 different 28nm GPU-families. The first one is codenamed "Northern Islands", which is basically a shrunk version of Southern Islands, with a new architecture. The other one is codenamed "Hecatonchires", which is going to feature MIMD-shaders. It's also rumored that Hecatonchires will have a modular design.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Nerdfighter</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 18:25:22 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19863-atis-28nm-to-be-built-in-gf-and-tsmc#comment-2413</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>The_Countess says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19863-atis-28nm-to-be-built-in-gf-and-tsmc#comment-2407</link>
			<description><![CDATA[TSMC isn't going to make any 32nm at all, for anybody. and GF isn't ready yet with a bulk process on 32nm, not soon enough to also include time to design chips anyway. so ATI has no choice but to skip directly to 28nm. Nvidia of course is in the same predicament, with the difference that they are betting on 1 horse(TSMC) as far as we know. ATI therefore has the best papers to succeed at 28nm, even without considering their considerable design advantage the last 2 generations.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>The_Countess</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 14:52:50 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19863-atis-28nm-to-be-built-in-gf-and-tsmc#comment-2407</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>kartikkg says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19863-atis-28nm-to-be-built-in-gf-and-tsmc#comment-2406</link>
			<description><![CDATA[hmmm a line in the article says that the chips have to be customized for two labs differently meaning a little more confusion for the customers from which lab their product is and a lot lot more for review sites to point at! if at all they make the lab name available on the product!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>kartikkg</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 14:43:10 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19863-atis-28nm-to-be-built-in-gf-and-tsmc#comment-2406</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>ezodagrom says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19863-atis-28nm-to-be-built-in-gf-and-tsmc#comment-2402</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Wrong, that's going to be their flagship 40nm refresh, the HD6000 series.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>ezodagrom</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 14:07:33 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19863-atis-28nm-to-be-built-in-gf-and-tsmc#comment-2402</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>East17 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19863-atis-28nm-to-be-built-in-gf-and-tsmc#comment-2400</link>
			<description><![CDATA[So they are both skipping 32nm ? I've known about this a long time but I've never thought they'd really do it. It's quite difficult for them to jump from 40nm to 28nm and difficult for the fabs too. Well, if they manage to pull this one off, good for us. If they don't, then AMD/ATi is only going downhill :(]]></description>
			<dc:creator>East17</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 13:48:11 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19863-atis-28nm-to-be-built-in-gf-and-tsmc#comment-2400</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
