<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>3.2GHz remains the fastest AMD in 2010</title>
		<description>Discuss 3.2GHz remains the fastest AMD in 2010</description>
		<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19664-32ghz-remains-the-fastest-amd-in-2010</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 02:06:48 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.fudzilla.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_k2/19664/10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>AndromedaB says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19664-32ghz-remains-the-fastest-amd-in-2010#comment-1813</link>
			<description><![CDATA[trolls be trollin]]></description>
			<dc:creator>AndromedaB</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 01:22:26 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19664-32ghz-remains-the-fastest-amd-in-2010#comment-1813</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Kitkat says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19664-32ghz-remains-the-fastest-amd-in-2010#comment-1782</link>
			<description><![CDATA[u can disable cores but that would be a motherboard property]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Kitkat</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 07:07:37 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19664-32ghz-remains-the-fastest-amd-in-2010#comment-1782</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>redisnidma says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19664-32ghz-remains-the-fastest-amd-in-2010#comment-1778</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Ohh man, that sucks. And I was hoping for a 3.4GHz 6-core Thuban :sad:]]></description>
			<dc:creator>redisnidma</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 05:31:20 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19664-32ghz-remains-the-fastest-amd-in-2010#comment-1778</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>dicobalt says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19664-32ghz-remains-the-fastest-amd-in-2010#comment-1776</link>
			<description><![CDATA[MHz cant help AMD with their current cores, they need way more. Besides the hex core AMD's CPU offerings are largely irrelevant compared to Intel's. Bulldozer better be damned impressive.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>dicobalt</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 04:50:40 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19664-32ghz-remains-the-fastest-amd-in-2010#comment-1776</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Fud_u says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19664-32ghz-remains-the-fastest-amd-in-2010#comment-1773</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Wow, six core sounded tempting. but I'm fine with my yesteryear quad Q9550 @3.6. The only program that can pull all those core for me is Adobe Premiere CS4. That program is wickedly CPU and GPU hog.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Fud_u</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 03:03:56 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19664-32ghz-remains-the-fastest-amd-in-2010#comment-1773</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>MichaelC4 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19664-32ghz-remains-the-fastest-amd-in-2010#comment-1765</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I guess they aren't going to put out the Phenom II X4 975 @ 3.6GHz? Come on, AMD, some of us want that kind of CPU.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>MichaelC4</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2010 21:44:16 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19664-32ghz-remains-the-fastest-amd-in-2010#comment-1765</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
