<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Point of View rolls out its TGT series </title>
		<description>Discuss Point of View rolls out its TGT series </description>
		<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19553-point-of-view-rolls-out-its-tgt-series</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 13:35:24 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.fudzilla.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_k2/19553/10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>Opiniator says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19553-point-of-view-rolls-out-its-tgt-series#comment-1281</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Problem is that NVIDIA already killed the 465. No use anymore as the 460 is almost reaching the same performance.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Opiniator</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 22:35:56 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19553-point-of-view-rolls-out-its-tgt-series#comment-1281</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>blandead says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19553-point-of-view-rolls-out-its-tgt-series#comment-1272</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I agree the 465 can overclock much nicer than the 470 and price/performance wise is better. I'm sure hand picked versions of it ultra clocked would be a much better value than a 470]]></description>
			<dc:creator>blandead</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 20:34:37 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19553-point-of-view-rolls-out-its-tgt-series#comment-1272</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Haberlandt says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19553-point-of-view-rolls-out-its-tgt-series#comment-1267</link>
			<description><![CDATA[No 465? :P]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Haberlandt</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 17:40:15 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19553-point-of-view-rolls-out-its-tgt-series#comment-1267</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>nele says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19553-point-of-view-rolls-out-its-tgt-series#comment-1266</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Frankly I don't know why they bothered with the 470 at all... TGT could spice things up a bit, good luck guys]]></description>
			<dc:creator>nele</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 17:14:14 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19553-point-of-view-rolls-out-its-tgt-series#comment-1266</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Patjuh says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19553-point-of-view-rolls-out-its-tgt-series#comment-1264</link>
			<description><![CDATA[OT: I am very glad (ofc as Dutchie) POV is becoming a real serious brand now in the gfx card industry on NVidia's party. The clockspeeds are imho impressive and mind that they come with 3 year warranty which is a lot compared to most producers which only get you double (=2 years) warranty on the cards or even the standard 1 year NVidia gives out. Compared to the high-end line of EVGA which has untill now always been a point of measurement for me, I think POV rocks with this new TGT line :D @ Demon: your 470 may be a good batch and lucky card with such speeds, but I am sure your card doesn't come with 3 years warranty, and what will be the real difference between your card and the 680 core clock of the POV UC, mind that the memory is also clocked at impressive speeds!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Patjuh</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 17:05:47 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19553-point-of-view-rolls-out-its-tgt-series#comment-1264</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>demon says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19553-point-of-view-rolls-out-its-tgt-series#comment-1239</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Not that impressed with the 470 clocks to be honest. My Sparkle 470 has been running with a core clock of 753Mhz for 2 months now and has been rock solid - Temps are around 85-87C..]]></description>
			<dc:creator>demon</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 13:26:04 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19553-point-of-view-rolls-out-its-tgt-series#comment-1239</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>macblastin says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19553-point-of-view-rolls-out-its-tgt-series#comment-1238</link>
			<description><![CDATA[EVGA Europe failed miserably when Hans what at the helm so cards backed by him is not something I would be interested in.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>macblastin</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 13:22:08 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19553-point-of-view-rolls-out-its-tgt-series#comment-1238</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>jon says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19553-point-of-view-rolls-out-its-tgt-series#comment-1237</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Looking forward to the surprises that the legendary Hans Wolfram Tismer has to bring under his new TGT brand at Point of View. 8) It looks like this company will become a GPU brand name I will pay more attention to next time I walk into a Fry's Electronics and ask for an inventory check.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>jon</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 13:17:38 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19553-point-of-view-rolls-out-its-tgt-series#comment-1237</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>stylewarrior says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19553-point-of-view-rolls-out-its-tgt-series#comment-1222</link>
			<description><![CDATA[any prices available already??]]></description>
			<dc:creator>stylewarrior</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 12:07:21 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19553-point-of-view-rolls-out-its-tgt-series#comment-1222</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
