<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Intel to settle FTC case</title>
		<description>Discuss Intel to settle FTC case</description>
		<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19540-intel-to-settle-ftc-case</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 19:19:51 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.fudzilla.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_k2/19540/10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>Bl0bb3r says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19540-intel-to-settle-ftc-case#comment-1251</link>
			<description><![CDATA[No. They have a tendency to introduce re-branded chipsets just as they do with their GPU line, practically charging extra for having a new name without new or improved features. I don't welcome them in the x86 arena. Let them play the tegra card, and keep them where they can do the least bit of good and keep them out of markets where they push s#it into people computers.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Bl0bb3r</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 14:33:11 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19540-intel-to-settle-ftc-case#comment-1251</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>pogsnet says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19540-intel-to-settle-ftc-case#comment-1247</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Good news for Nvidia if they have chipset market again, it will spice up the tech world if they do so, I hope.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>pogsnet</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 13:58:35 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19540-intel-to-settle-ftc-case#comment-1247</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
