<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>StarCraft II took over $100 million to make</title>
		<description>Discuss StarCraft II took over $100 million to make</description>
		<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19529-starcraft-ii-took-over-$100-million-to-make</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 May 2013 09:34:04 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.fudzilla.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_k2/19529/10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>blandead says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19529-starcraft-ii-took-over-$100-million-to-make#comment-1162</link>
			<description><![CDATA[just because blizzard needed some funding from activision for SC2 doesn't mean they are gonna have full control of their dumb DRM protection. Blizzard isn't stupid enough to release a game that will fail because of a bad activation process. Just wait tilt he game comes out to see if it's even a problem, and I'm not talking to the pirates out there.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>blandead</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 20:09:00 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19529-starcraft-ii-took-over-$100-million-to-make#comment-1162</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>gangsta072 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19529-starcraft-ii-took-over-$100-million-to-make#comment-1147</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Also people play StarCraft because its fun and not because someone at Activision thinks they are gonna sell that SH..... :zzz]]></description>
			<dc:creator>gangsta072</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 16:02:44 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19529-starcraft-ii-took-over-$100-million-to-make#comment-1147</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>gangsta072 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19529-starcraft-ii-took-over-$100-million-to-make#comment-1146</link>
			<description><![CDATA[StarCraft 2 is shit ; even not worth a illegal download ..... :-x]]></description>
			<dc:creator>gangsta072</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 16:01:12 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19529-starcraft-ii-took-over-$100-million-to-make#comment-1146</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>MrScary says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19529-starcraft-ii-took-over-$100-million-to-make#comment-1136</link>
			<description><![CDATA[u can´t. Beta has been awesome.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>MrScary</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 14:32:59 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19529-starcraft-ii-took-over-$100-million-to-make#comment-1136</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>semitope says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19529-starcraft-ii-took-over-$100-million-to-make#comment-1135</link>
			<description><![CDATA[3 times for the same game? Guess I am pirating it after all then =/]]></description>
			<dc:creator>semitope</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 14:27:59 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19529-starcraft-ii-took-over-$100-million-to-make#comment-1135</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>JAB Creations says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19529-starcraft-ii-took-over-$100-million-to-make#comment-1125</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Activision? Really? Activision has nothing to do with Starcraft other then taking the game and splicing it in to three "installments" and requiring consumers to pay three times for the same game. Blizzard is better then that...or at least that's what I thought before they tarnished everything by merging with Activision. *sighs*]]></description>
			<dc:creator>JAB Creations</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 11:26:16 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/19529-starcraft-ii-took-over-$100-million-to-make#comment-1125</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
